Colo Vale vs Mittagong
Colo Vale is the younger of the two, with a median age of 38 against 49 in Mittagong. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Colo Vale, about half of households are couple families. In Mittagong, about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Mittagong: a median of $1.09 million, against $965,000 in Colo Vale, though rent is higher in Colo Vale. On these figures, Colo Vale tends to suit families with children and couples, while Mittagong suits people living alone and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Colo Vale carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 68/100)
- Mittagong has more parks and reserves (9 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Colo Vale
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper land ($605,000 vs $1,050,000)
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (26% vs 33%)
- has cheaper houses ($965,000 vs $1,090,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Colo Vale leaves renters under less rental stress (23% vs 28%)
- Mittagong has a bigger rental market to choose from (29% vs 18%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Colo Vale sits closer to the CBD (109.2 km vs 113.6 km)
- Mittagong is more walkable (14/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mittagong
ahead on 4 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (14/100 vs 0/100)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (16% vs 1%)
- has more GPs (5 vs 0)
- But Colo Vale carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 68/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Colo Vale and Mittagong drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mittagong has more residents (6,090 vs 1,775); Colo Vale has higher household incomes ($97,500 vs $74,100).
| Colo Vale | Mittagong | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,775 | 6,090 +243% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +9.7% | +5.6% |
| Median age | 38 | 49 |
| Median household income | $97,500/yr +24% vs other | $74,100/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $430/wk +7% vs other | $400/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Colo Vale | Mittagong | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $965,000 | $1,090,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $710,000 |
| Median land price | $605,000 | $1,050,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 32 days from 23 sales | 35 days from 47 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
18 vs 39 sales
23 vs 27 sales
Zoning mix
Colo Vale has more rural and farming land (21% vs 3%).
| Colo Vale | Mittagong | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 76% | 82% |
| Rural and farming | 21% | 3% |
| Residential | 2% | 11% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 1% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Colo Vale | Mittagong | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 335 across Wingecarribee same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +6% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Colo Vale | Mittagong | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.0% $700/wk on $1.2M | 3.2% $750/wk on $1.21M |
| Units | — | 3.6% $550/wk on $785K |
Ranking within NSW
| Colo Vale | Mittagong | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 51% of NSW | Higher than 60% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 66% of NSW | Higher than 41% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 57% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 26% of NSW | Higher than 64% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 62% of NSW | Higher than 32% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 72% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 67% of NSW | Higher than 71% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 23% of NSW | Higher than 31% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 14% of NSW |
Liveability
Mittagong is more walkable (14 vs 0); Mittagong scores higher overall (37 vs 31).
| Colo Vale | Mittagong | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 31/100 | 37/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Mittagong carries more crime risk (68 vs 27); Colo Vale carries more bushfire risk (92 vs 76).
| Colo Vale | Mittagong | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 92/100 | High 76/100 |
| Crime | Low 27/100 | Moderate 68/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Colo Vale | Mittagong | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 4 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 1 same for both | |
Schools in Colo Vale
- Colo Vale Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Mittagong
- St Michael's Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Frensham Junior School Independent · Primary at peers
- Frensham School Independent · Secondary at peers
- Mittagong Public School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Colo Vale | Mittagong | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 19 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 9 |
| Childcare | 2 | 5 |
| GPs | 0 | 5 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 4 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 4 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 9 | 18 |
Mobility
Mittagong sits further from the CBD (113.6 km vs 109.2 km).
| Colo Vale | Mittagong | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 14/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 109.2 km | 113.6 km +4% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 83 min | 86 min |
| Public transport score | 49/100 Bus | 77/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 20.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 61.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 2575 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 52 postcode 2575 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.8%).
Setting
| Colo Vale | Mittagong | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 684 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 620 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 40.7 km | 35.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Colo Vale | Mittagong | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 51/100 | 61/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 17% 695 premises | 29% 3,572 premises |
Climate
| Colo Vale | Mittagong | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 974 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Colo Vale | Mittagong | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,072/yr same for both | |
| Council | Wingecarribee same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Colo Vale | Mittagong | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Whitlam same for both | |
| Member | Carol Berry same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Colo Vale | Mittagong | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Colo Vale
Other comparisons with Mittagong
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.