Colo Vale vs High Range
Colo Vale is the younger of the two, with a median age of 38 against 45 in High Range. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Colo Vale, about half of households are couple families. In High Range, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in High Range: a median of $2.96 million, against $965,000 in Colo Vale, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Colo Vale tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget, while High Range suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
High Range
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 27/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (79% vs 70%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Colo Vale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($965,000 vs $2,965,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Colo Vale
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (18% vs 6%)
- has cheaper rent ($430/wk vs $565/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Colo Vale
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (83 min vs 102 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (109.2 km vs 132.7 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
High Range
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 27/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
High Range
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (26.1% vs 9.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Colo Vale and High Range drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Colo Vale has more residents (1,775 vs 497); High Range has higher household incomes ($143,000 vs $97,500).
| Colo Vale | High Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,775 +72% vs other | 497 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +9.7% | +26.1% |
| Median age | 38 | 45 |
| Median household income | $97,500/yr | $143,000/yr +47% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $430/wk | $565/wk +31% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Colo Vale | High Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $965,000 | $2,965,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $605,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 32 days from 23 sales | — |
Zoning mix
| Colo Vale | High Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 76% | 83% |
| Rural and farming | 21% | 17% |
| Residential | 2% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Colo Vale | High Range | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 335 across Wingecarribee same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +6% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Colo Vale | High Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.0% $700/wk on $1.2M | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Colo Vale | High Range | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 51% of NSW | Higher than 93% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 66% of NSW | Higher than 92% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 26% of NSW | Higher than 4% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 62% of NSW | Higher than 16% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 72% of NSW | Higher than 71% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 67% of NSW | Higher than 35% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 23% of NSW | — |
Liveability
| Colo Vale | High Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | — |
| Score | 31/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Colo Vale carries more crime risk (27 vs 12).
| Colo Vale | High Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 92/100 | High 83/100 |
| Crime | Low 27/100 | Low 12/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Colo Vale | High Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Colo Vale
- Colo Vale Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in High Range
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Colo Vale | High Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 9 | 17 |
Mobility
High Range sits further from the CBD (132.7 km vs 109.2 km).
| Colo Vale | High Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Sydney | 109.2 km | 132.7 km +22% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 83 min | 102 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 2575 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 52 postcode 2575 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.8%).
Setting
| Colo Vale | High Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 684 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 692 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Colo Vale | High Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 51/100 | 25/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 17% 695 premises | 0% 123 premises |
Climate
| Colo Vale | High Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 974 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Colo Vale | High Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,072/yr same for both | |
| Council | Wingecarribee same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Colo Vale | High Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Whitlam same for both | |
| Member | Carol Berry same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Colo Vale | High Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Colo Vale
Other comparisons with High Range
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.