Coleyville vs Mutdapilly
Mutdapilly is the younger of the two, with a median age of 44 against 49 in Coleyville. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Mutdapilly, most households are couple families. On these figures, Mutdapilly tends to suit families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Coleyville carries lower crime risk (16/100 vs 29/100)
- Mutdapilly has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Coleyville
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (18% vs 29%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Mutdapilly
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($300/wk vs $330/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mutdapilly
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (52 min vs 60 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (61.1 km vs 70.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Coleyville
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (16/100 vs 29/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (23% vs 17%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Coleyville and Mutdapilly drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mutdapilly has more residents (308 vs 192); Coleyville has higher household incomes ($113,100 vs $82,836).
| Coleyville | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 192 | 308 +60% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +3.8% | +0.0% |
| Median age | 49 | 44 |
| Median household income | $113,100/yr +27% vs other | $82,836/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $330/wk +9% vs other | $300/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.1%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Development activity
| Coleyville | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 524 across Scenic Rim same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +65% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Coleyville | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 84% of QLD | Higher than 54% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 49% of QLD | Higher than 20% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 66% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 45% of QLD | Higher than 53% of QLD |
Liveability
| Coleyville | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Mutdapilly carries more crime risk (29 vs 16).
| Coleyville | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 16/100 | Low 29/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 | Low 14/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Coleyville | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Coleyville
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Mutdapilly
- Mutdapilly State School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Coleyville | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 3 | 2 |
Mobility
Coleyville sits further from the CBD (70.4 km vs 61.1 km).
| Coleyville | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 70.4 km +13% vs other | 61.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 60 min | 52 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 4307 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 93 postcode 4307 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (69.9%).
Setting
| Coleyville | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 88 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 68 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Coleyville | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 58 premises | 0% 126 premises |
Climate
| Coleyville | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 897 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.3°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.1°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Coleyville | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.27 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Coleyville | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,689/yr same for both | |
| Council | Scenic Rim same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Coleyville | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wright same for both | |
| Member | Scott Buchholz same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Coleyville | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Coleyville
Other comparisons with Mutdapilly
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.