Colebee vs Marsden Park
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and the large majority of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Colebee: a median of $1.43 million, against $1.23 million in Marsden Park, and rent is higher there too.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Marsden Park
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools inside the suburb (5 vs 0)
- has more childcare (9 vs 2)
- But Colebee carries lower crime risk (52/100 vs 67/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Marsden Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,230,000 vs $1,425,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Marsden Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($570/wk vs $620/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Colebee
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (63/100 vs 37/100)
- has a shorter drive in (42 min vs 47 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (47.2 km vs 51.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Colebee
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (63/100 vs 37/100)
- carries lower crime risk (52/100 vs 67/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield.
Where they sit
Colebee and Marsden Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Marsden Park has more residents (14,610 vs 4,914); Colebee has higher household incomes ($167,596 vs $141,544).
| Colebee | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,914 | 14,610 +197% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +154.5% | — |
| Median age | 33 | 32 |
| Median household income | $167,596/yr +16% vs other | $141,544/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $620/wk +8% vs other | $570/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Colebee | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,425,000 | $1,230,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $530,000 |
| Median land price | $1,125,000 | $1,035,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 44 days from 96 sales | 39 days from 246 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
7 vs 26 sales
76 vs 161 sales
33 vs 99 sales
10 vs 5 sales
Zoning mix
Colebee has more land zoned for conservation (25% vs 3%); Marsden Park has more industrially zoned land (16% vs 0%).
| Colebee | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 36% | 31% |
| Environmental | 25% | 3% |
| Parks and recreation | 24% | 7% |
| Industrial | 0% | 16% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 13% | 16% |
| Rural and farming | 1% | 14% |
| Commercial | 1% | 10% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 4% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Colebee | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,325 across Blacktown same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -18% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Colebee | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.4% $890/wk on $1.35M | 3.7% $875/wk on $1.24M |
| Units | — | 4.7% $600/wk on $670K |
Ranking within NSW
| Colebee | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 69% of NSW | Higher than 59% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 97% of NSW | Higher than 92% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 19% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 86% of NSW | Higher than 77% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 79% of NSW | Higher than 78% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 76% of NSW | Higher than 96% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 100% of NSW | Higher than 98% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 40% of NSW | Higher than 55% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 51% of NSW |
Liveability
Colebee is more walkable (63 vs 37); Colebee scores higher overall (71 vs 47).
| Colebee | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | C |
| Score | 71/100 | 47/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Marsden Park carries more bushfire risk (38 vs 24); Marsden Park carries more crime risk (67 vs 52).
| Colebee | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 24/100 | Low 38/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 52/100 | Moderate 67/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 7 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Colebee | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 5 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 3 |
Schools in Colebee
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Marsden Park
- St Luke's Catholic College (Secondary) Catholic · Secondary at peers
- Marsden Park Anglican College Independent · Combined below peers
- Marsden Park Public School Government · Primary below peers
- St Luke’s Catholic College (Primary) Catholic · Primary below peers
- St Luke's Arrunga Catholic · Combined · Special school
Amenities in the suburb
| Colebee | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 same for both | |
| Cafes & restaurants | 4 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 4 |
| Childcare | 2 | 9 |
| GPs | 2 | 3 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 4 |
| Waterways | 2 same for both | |
Mobility
Marsden Park sits further from the CBD (51.1 km vs 47.2 km).
| Colebee | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 63/100 | 37/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 47.2 km | 51.1 km +8% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 42 min | 47 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 38.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 211.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 2761 | 2.7% postcode 2765 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 64 postcode 2761 | — postcode 2765 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (47.0%).
Setting
| Colebee | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 41 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 46 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 37.3 km | 39.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Colebee | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 | 98/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 100% 1,712 premises | 96% 6,110 premises |
Climate
| Colebee | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 932 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Colebee | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 15.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.53 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Colebee | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,157/yr same for both | |
| Council | Blacktown same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Colebee | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Chifley same for both | |
| Member | Ed Husic same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Colebee | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Marsden Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Colebee
Other comparisons with Marsden Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.