Cold Harbour vs Mount Hardey
Cold Harbour is the younger of the two, with a median age of 48 against 56 in Mount Hardey. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Cold Harbour, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Cold Harbour tends to suit families with children and couples, while Mount Hardey suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Cold Harbour is already more of a family suburb (71% vs 44%)
- Mount Hardey has more parks and reserves (3 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Cold Harbour
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (106.1 km vs 108.3 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Cold Harbour
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (42.1% vs -11.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cold Harbour and Mount Hardey drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Hardey has more residents (154 vs 108); Mount Hardey skews older (56 vs 48).
| Cold Harbour | Mount Hardey | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 108 | 154 +43% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +42.1% | -11.5% |
| Median age | 48 | 56 |
| Median household income | $88,348/yr +13% vs other | $76,856/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk | $348/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (27.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.1%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Development activity
| Cold Harbour | Mount Hardey | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 31 across York same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -50% same for both | |
Ranking within WA
| Cold Harbour | Mount Hardey | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 52% of WA | Higher than 39% of WA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 65% of WA | Higher than 41% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 29% of WA | Higher than 28% of WA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 58% of WA | Higher than 57% of WA |
Liveability
| Cold Harbour | Mount Hardey | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Mount Hardey carries more bushfire risk (11 vs 0).
| Cold Harbour | Mount Hardey | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 11/100 |
| Crime | Low 16/100 same for both | |
| Flood | Low 34/100 | Low 25/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Cold Harbour | Mount Hardey | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Cold Harbour | Mount Hardey | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 3 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
Mount Hardey sits further from the CBD (108.3 km vs 106.1 km).
| Cold Harbour | Mount Hardey | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Perth | 106.1 km | 108.3 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 92 min | 94 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 6302 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 66 postcode 6302 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (82.9%).
Setting
| Cold Harbour | Mount Hardey | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 239 m above sea level, at the suburb centre same for both | |
NBN connectivity
| Cold Harbour | Mount Hardey | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 50 premises | 0% 98 premises |
Climate
| Cold Harbour | Mount Hardey | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 399 mm | 384 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 34.3°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 5.3°C |
Council rates
| Cold Harbour | Mount Hardey | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $4,433/yr same for both | |
| Council | York same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Cold Harbour | Mount Hardey | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bullwinkel same for both | |
| Member | Trish Cook same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cold Harbour | Mount Hardey | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cold Harbour
Other comparisons with Mount Hardey
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.