Clontarf vs Mango Hill
Mango Hill is the younger of the two, with a median age of 31 against 46 in Clontarf. In both, most homes are detached houses. In Clontarf, most households own their home. In Mango Hill, about half of households rent and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Mango Hill: a median of $1.06 million, against $960,000 in Clontarf, and rent is higher there too. Mango Hill is closer to the city centre: 30.8 km, against 36.4 km. On these figures, Clontarf tends to suit people living alone and older residents, while Mango Hill suits renters, families with children, and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Clontarf carries lower crime risk (10/100 vs 61/100)
- Mango Hill has more schools inside the suburb (5 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mango Hill
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (22% vs 29%)
- has cheaper units ($650,000 vs $807,500)
- has cheaper land ($1,057,500 vs $1,302,500)
- But Clontarf has cheaper houses ($960,000 vs $1,065,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Mango Hill
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (47% vs 35%)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (19% vs 25%)
- But Clontarf has cheaper rent ($345/wk vs $400/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mango Hill
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (52/100 vs 42/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (30.8 km vs 36.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Clontarf carries lower crime risk (10/100 vs 61/100)
- Mango Hill has more GPs (3 vs 1)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mango Hill
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is growing faster (76.9% vs 2.0%)
- returns a higher gross yield on units (4.2% vs 3.0%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Clontarf and Mango Hill drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mango Hill has more residents (14,921 vs 8,446); Mango Hill has higher household incomes ($111,540 vs $71,916).
| Clontarf | Mango Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,446 | 14,921 +77% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.0% | +76.9% |
| Median age | 46 | 31 |
| Median household income | $71,916/yr | $111,540/yr +55% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $345/wk | $400/wk +16% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Clontarf | Mango Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $960,000 | $1,065,000 |
| Median unit price | $807,500 | $650,000 |
| Median land price | $1,302,500 | $1,057,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 23 days from 95 sales | 27 days from 171 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
19 vs 11 sales
13 vs 20 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
131 vs 32 sales
51 vs 173 sales
12 vs 25 sales
Development activity
| Clontarf | Mango Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 6,996 across Moreton Bay same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +49% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Clontarf | Mango Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.0% $750/wk on $969K | 3.7% $680/wk on $949K |
| Units | 3.0% $470/wk on $815K | 4.2% $600/wk on $750K |
Ranking within QLD
| Clontarf | Mango Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 41% of QLD | Higher than 83% of QLD |
| Schools | — | Higher than 13% of QLD |
| Walkability | Higher than 85% of QLD | Higher than 87% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 76% of QLD | Higher than 92% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 85% of QLD | Higher than 96% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 56% of QLD | Higher than 37% of QLD |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 5% of QLD | Higher than 37% of QLD |
Liveability
Mango Hill is more walkable (52 vs 42).
| Clontarf | Mango Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 54/100 | 56/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Clontarf carries more bushfire risk (51 vs 0); Mango Hill carries more crime risk (61 vs 10).
| Clontarf | Mango Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 51/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Low 10/100 | Moderate 61/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 | Moderate 60/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Clontarf | Mango Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 5 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 3 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | None | 1 UniSC Moreton Bay, 7.3 km |
Schools in Clontarf
- Clontarf Beach State High School Government · Secondary at peers
- Clontarf Beach State School Government · Primary at peers
- Grace Lutheran Primary School Independent · Primary at peers
Schools in Mango Hill
- Mango Hill State School Government · Primary at peers
- St Benedict's College Catholic · Secondary at peers
- St Benedict's Primary School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Mango Hill State Secondary College Government · Secondary below peers
- Y Schools Queensland - Moreton Bay (Mango Hill Campus) Independent · Secondary · Special school
Amenities in the suburb
| Clontarf | Mango Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 same for both | |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 12 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 11 |
| Childcare | 9 | 10 |
| GPs | 1 | 3 |
| Pharmacies | 2 same for both | |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 4 | 3 |
| Waterways | 0 | 14 |
Mobility
Clontarf sits further from the CBD (36.4 km vs 30.8 km).
| Clontarf | Mango Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 42/100 | 52/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 36.4 km +15% vs other | 30.8 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 41 min | 38 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 95/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 108.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 64.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 4019 | 1.7% postcode 4509 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 43 postcode 4019 | 65 postcode 4509 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (73.6%).
Setting
| Clontarf | Mango Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 5 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 3 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 923 m 1.8 km to a named beach | 2.3 km 4.3 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Clontarf | Mango Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 75/100 | 91/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 1% 4,607 premises | 83% 5,892 premises |
Climate
| Clontarf | Mango Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,032 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Clontarf | Mango Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.7 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.43 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Clontarf | Mango Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,577/yr same for both | |
| Council | Moreton Bay same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Clontarf | Mango Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Petrie same for both | |
| Member | Emma Comer same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Clontarf | Mango Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Clontarf
Other comparisons with Mango Hill
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.