Clarence Park vs Clarence Gardens
In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Clarence Gardens, about half of households are couple families. Clarence Park is closer to the city centre: 5.7 km, against 7 km. On these figures, Clarence Park tends to suit people living alone, while Clarence Gardens suits families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Clarence Gardens
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- is already more of a family suburb (65% vs 49%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (84% vs 66%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Clarence Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($310/wk vs $350/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Clarence Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (88/100 vs 77/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Clarence Park
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (34% vs 16%)
- is more walkable (88/100 vs 77/100)
- But Clarence Gardens has more GPs (2 vs 0)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Clarence Park and Clarence Gardens drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Clarence Gardens has higher household incomes ($114,400 vs $93,548); Clarence Gardens rents higher ($350/wk vs $310/wk).
| Clarence Park | Clarence Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,658 +11% vs other | 2,373 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.6% | +3.0% |
| Median age | 39 | 38 |
| Median household income | $93,548/yr | $114,400/yr +22% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $310/wk | $350/wk +13% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.1%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Clarence Park | Clarence Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,274,500 | $1,360,000 |
| Median unit price | $600,000 | $552,500 |
| Median land price | $720,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 16 days from 16 sales | 17 days from 18 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
31 vs 24 sales
16 vs 24 sales
Zoning mix
Clarence Gardens has more industrially zoned land (13% vs 0%).
| Clarence Park | Clarence Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 100% | 81% |
| Industrial | 0% | 13% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 7% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Clarence Park | Clarence Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 273 across Unley | 188 across Mitcham |
| Approvals change year on year | -67% | +32% |
Gross rental yield
| Clarence Park | Clarence Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.1% $660/wk on $1.11M | 2.8% $705/wk on $1.31M |
| Units | 4.8% $550/wk on $600K | — |
Ranking within SA
| Clarence Park | Clarence Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 79% of SA | Higher than 74% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 72% of SA | Higher than 88% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 97% of SA | Higher than 91% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 24% of SA | Higher than 55% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 90% of SA | Higher than 79% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 85% of SA | Higher than 88% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 17% of SA | Higher than 11% of SA |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 63% of SA | — |
Liveability
Clarence Park scores higher overall (87 vs 70); Clarence Park is more walkable (88 vs 77).
| Clarence Park | Clarence Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A+ | A |
| Score | 87/100 | 70/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Clarence Gardens carries more flood risk (75 vs 16).
| Clarence Park | Clarence Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 56/100 | Moderate 54/100 |
| Flood | Low 16/100 | High 75/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 6 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Clarence Park | Clarence Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Tonsley, 4.0 km | 3 Tonsley, 3.0 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 4.3% | 3.0% |
Amenities in the suburb
| Clarence Park | Clarence Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 3 |
| Childcare | 2 | 1 |
| GPs | 0 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
| Clarence Park | Clarence Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 88/100 | 77/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 5.7 km | 7 km +23% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 12 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Rail · Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 51.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 34.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.7% postcode 5034 | 1.1% postcode 5039 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 51 postcode 5034 | 55 postcode 5039 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (67.7%).
Setting
| Clarence Park | Clarence Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 38 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 39 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 6.6 km | 6.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Clarence Park | Clarence Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 74/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 2% 1,233 premises | 0% 1,014 premises |
Climate
| Clarence Park | Clarence Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 457 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Clarence Park | Clarence Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Clarence Park | Clarence Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,288/yr | $2,296/yr |
| Council | Unley | Mitcham |
Federal electorate
| Clarence Park | Clarence Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Boothby same for both | |
| Member | Louise Miller-Frost same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Clarence Park | Clarence Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Clarence Park
Clarence Gardens
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Clarence Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.