Claremont vs Mount Claremont
In both, most households own their home. In Claremont, about half of households are people living alone. In Mount Claremont, the large majority of homes are detached houses and about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Mount Claremont: a median of $2.4 million, against $2.15 million in Claremont, though rent is higher in Claremont. On these figures, Claremont tends to suit people living alone, while Mount Claremont suits families with children and couples.
Claremont and Mount Claremont are affluent suburbs with similar demographics, but differ notably in walkability and property costs. Claremont is more walkable (96 vs 71) and closer to the CBD at 9.1 km, with a higher liveability score of 86. Mount Claremont has a higher median household income of $147,420 and significantly higher property prices—median houses at $2,400,000 versus $2,137,500, and units at $1,370,000 versus $875,000. Claremont may suit those prioritising walkability and accessibility, while Mount Claremont appeals to buyers seeking a quieter, more affluent enclave willing to pay a premium.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Claremont
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more separate houses rather than flats (78% vs 39%)
- carries lower crime risk (40/100 vs 63/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (66% vs 45%)
- But Claremont has more schools rated above their peers (2 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Claremont
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper units ($880,000 vs $1,370,000)
- has cheaper houses ($2,150,000 vs $2,400,000)
- But Mount Claremont leaves households under less mortgage stress (25% vs 31%)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Mount Claremont
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (15% vs 22%)
- has cheaper rent ($420/wk vs $460/wk)
- But Claremont has a bigger rental market to choose from (34% vs 17%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Claremont
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- gets more of its commuters onto trains and trams (9% vs 4%)
- is more walkable (96/100 vs 71/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Claremont
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (7 vs 1)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (61% vs 22%)
- is more walkable (96/100 vs 71/100)
- But Mount Claremont carries lower crime risk (40/100 vs 63/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Claremont
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (13.5% vs 8.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Claremont and Mount Claremont drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Claremont has more residents (9,248 vs 4,999); Mount Claremont has higher household incomes ($147,420 vs $107,536).
| Claremont | Mount Claremont | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,248 +46% vs other | 4,999 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +13.5% | +8.3% |
| Median age | 44 | 45 |
| Median household income | $107,536/yr | $147,420/yr +37% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $460/wk +9% vs other | $420/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (27.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Claremont | Mount Claremont | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,150,000 | $2,400,000 |
| Median unit price | $880,000 | $1,370,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 36 days from 84 sales | 10 days from 36 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
57 vs 15 sales
35 vs 34 sales
9 vs 11 sales
Development activity
| Claremont | Mount Claremont | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 158 across Claremont | 115 across Nedlands |
| Approvals change year on year | — | -44% |
Gross rental yield
| Claremont | Mount Claremont | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.9% $1,125/wk on $2M | — |
| Units | 4.6% $790/wk on $900K | — |
Ranking within WA
| Claremont | Mount Claremont | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 73% of WA | Higher than 96% of WA |
| Schools | Higher than 84% of WA | Higher than 43% of WA |
| Walkability | Higher than 100% of WA | Higher than 90% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 99% of WA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 85% of WA | Higher than 87% of WA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 5% of WA | — |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 15% of WA | — |
Liveability
Claremont is more walkable (96 vs 71); Claremont scores higher overall (86 vs 79).
| Claremont | Mount Claremont | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A same for both | |
| Score | 86/100 | 79/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Claremont carries more flood risk (23 vs 0); Claremont carries more crime risk (63 vs 40).
| Claremont | Mount Claremont | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 63/100 | Moderate 40/100 |
| Flood | Low 23/100 | None 0/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 10 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Claremont | Mount Claremont | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 4 | 5 |
| Rated above peers | 2 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 2 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 The University of Western Australia, 4.3 km | 3 The University of Western Australia, 5.1 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 4.6% | 4.5% |
Schools in Claremont
- Christ Church Grammar School Independent · Combined above peers
- Methodist Ladies' College Independent · Combined above peers
- Freshwater Bay Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- St Thomas' Primary School Catholic · Primary below peers
Schools in Mount Claremont
- John XXIII College Catholic · Combined above peers
- Moerlina School Independent · Primary at peers
- Mount Claremont Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Quintilian School Independent · Primary below peers
- SEDA College WA (Mount Claremont Campus) Independent · Secondary
Amenities in the suburb
| Claremont | Mount Claremont | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 3 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 18 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 17 |
| Childcare | 8 | 5 |
| GPs | 7 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 4 | 1 |
| Hospitals | 1 same for both | |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 6 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 2 | 1 |
Mobility
| Claremont | Mount Claremont | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 96/100 | 71/100 |
| Distance to Perth | 9.1 km | 10.1 km +11% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 15 min | 18 min |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Rail · Bus | 92/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 352.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 129.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 3.2% postcode 6010 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 38 postcode 6010 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (65.1%).
Setting
| Claremont | Mount Claremont | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 20 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 26 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 2.7 km 2.9 km to a named beach | 2.5 km 2.6 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Claremont | Mount Claremont | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 73/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 19% 5,550 premises | 11% 2,099 premises |
Climate
| Claremont | Mount Claremont | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 650 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Claremont | Mount Claremont | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,733/yr | $2,425/yr |
| Council | Claremont | Nedlands |
Federal electorate
| Claremont | Mount Claremont | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Curtin same for both | |
| Member | Kate Chaney same for both | |
| Party | Independent same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Claremont | Mount Claremont | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Claremont
Mount Claremont
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Claremont
Other comparisons with Mount Claremont
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.