Clapham vs Torrens Park
Comparing Clapham and Torrens Park, SA: Torrens Park carries more crime risk (56 vs 27); Torrens Park has more residents (2,687 vs 1,685); and Clapham is more walkable (70 vs 54).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Clapham
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 56/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (88% vs 70%)
- is already more of a family suburb (67% vs 58%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Torrens Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($330/wk vs $395/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Clapham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (70/100 vs 54/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Clapham
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 56/100)
- is more walkable (70/100 vs 54/100)
- But Torrens Park has more units and townhouses to downsize into (30% vs 12%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Clapham and Torrens Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Torrens Park has more residents (2,687 vs 1,685); Clapham rents higher ($395/wk vs $330/wk).
| Clapham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,685 | 2,687 +59% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.5% | +3.5% |
| Median age | 42 | 43 |
| Median household income | $120,692/yr +7% vs other | $112,580/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $395/wk +16% vs other | $330/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Clapham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,323,000 | $1,405,000 |
| Median unit price | $640,000 | $605,500 |
| Median land price | — | $1,425,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 21 days from 15 sales | 21 days from 16 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
26 vs 16 sales
12 vs 27 sales
Zoning mix
| Clapham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 100% | 90% |
| Environmental | 0% | 7% |
| Commercial | 0% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Clapham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 188 across Mitcham same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +32% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Clapham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — same for both | |
| Units | — | 3.0% $440/wk on $770K |
Ranking within SA
| Clapham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 65% of SA | Higher than 94% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 93% of SA | Higher than 88% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 88% of SA | Higher than 82% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 77% of SA | Higher than 11% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 97% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 97% of SA | Higher than 94% of SA |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 1% of SA |
Liveability
Clapham is more walkable (70 vs 54); Clapham scores higher overall (75 vs 68).
| Clapham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A same for both | |
| Score | 75/100 | 68/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Torrens Park carries more crime risk (56 vs 27); Clapham carries more flood risk (82 vs 69).
| Clapham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 27/100 | Moderate 56/100 |
| Flood | High 82/100 | Moderate 69/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Clapham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Tonsley, 3.2 km | 3 Tonsley, 4.2 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.8% | 4.1% |
Schools in Clapham
- Clapham Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Torrens Park
- Scotch College - Torrens Park Campus Independent · Combined at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Clapham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 0 |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 9 |
Mobility
| Clapham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 70/100 | 54/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 8.1 km +10% vs other | 7.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 15 min | 14 min |
| Public transport score | 58/100 Bus | 78/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 16.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 61.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.5% postcode 5062 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 63 postcode 5062 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (68.1%).
Setting
| Clapham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 87 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 114 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 8.6 km | 9.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Clapham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 93/100 | 83/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Hybrid fibre-coaxial |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 88% 687 premises | 34% 1,245 premises |
Climate
| Clapham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 457 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Clapham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Clapham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,296/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mitcham same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Clapham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Boothby same for both | |
| Member | Louise Miller-Frost same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Clapham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Clapham
Torrens Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Clapham
Other comparisons with Torrens Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.