Chum Creek vs Healesville
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Chum Creek, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Chum Creek tends to suit couples, while Healesville suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Chum Creek carries lower crime risk (17/100 vs 60/100)
- Healesville has more childcare (8 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Chum Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (21% vs 27%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Healesville
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (18% vs 7%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Chum Creek is more walkable (13/100 vs 4/100)
- Healesville sits closer to the CBD (65.8 km vs 69.6 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Chum Creek
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (17/100 vs 60/100)
- is more walkable (13/100 vs 4/100)
- But Healesville has more GPs (4 vs 0)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Chum Creek and Healesville drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Healesville has more residents (7,589 vs 981); Chum Creek has higher household incomes ($98,904 vs $76,544).
| Chum Creek | Healesville | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 981 | 7,589 +674% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -0.2% | +1.7% |
| Median age | 45 | 46 |
| Median household income | $98,904/yr +23% vs other | $76,544/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $361/wk +3% vs other | $350/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Chum Creek | Healesville | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $825,000 | $805,500 |
| Median unit price | — | $610,175 |
| Median land price | — | $537,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 68 days from 6 sales | 30 days from 75 sales |
Zoning mix
Chum Creek has more land zoned for conservation (34% vs 6%); Chum Creek has more rural and farming land (55% vs 29%).
| Chum Creek | Healesville | |
|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 56% |
| Rural and farming | 55% | 29% |
| Environmental | 34% | 6% |
| Parks and recreation | 9% | 5% |
| Residential | 0% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Chum Creek | Healesville | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 416 across Yarra Ranges same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -57% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Chum Creek | Healesville | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.8% $650/wk on $888K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Chum Creek | Healesville | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 34% of VIC | Higher than 52% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 71% of VIC | Higher than 44% of VIC |
| Schools | — | Higher than 5% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 76% of VIC | Higher than 65% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 87% of VIC | Higher than 38% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 68% of VIC same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 76% of VIC | Higher than 79% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 55% of VIC |
Liveability
Chum Creek is more walkable (13 vs 4); Chum Creek scores higher overall (49 vs 23).
| Chum Creek | Healesville | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | D |
| Score | 49/100 | 23/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Healesville carries more flood risk (58 vs 0); Healesville carries more crime risk (60 vs 17).
| Chum Creek | Healesville | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 99/100 | High 96/100 |
| Crime | Low 17/100 | Moderate 60/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 | Moderate 58/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Chum Creek | Healesville | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 4 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 2 |
Schools in Chum Creek
- Chum Creek Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Healesville
- Healesville Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Healesville High School Government · Secondary below peers
- St Brigid's School Catholic · Primary below peers
- Worawa Aboriginal College Independent · Secondary · Special school
Amenities in the suburb
| Chum Creek | Healesville | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 4 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 15 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 17 |
| Childcare | 0 | 8 |
| GPs | 0 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 4 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 4 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 1 | 80 |
Mobility
Chum Creek sits further from the CBD (69.6 km vs 65.8 km).
| Chum Creek | Healesville | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 13/100 | 4/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 69.6 km +5% vs other | 65.8 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 74 min | 73 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 3777 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 42 postcode 3777 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (69.7%).
Setting
| Chum Creek | Healesville | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 179 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 156 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Chum Creek | Healesville | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 63/100 | 69/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 38% 334 premises | 45% 3,775 premises |
Climate
| Chum Creek | Healesville | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,215 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 22.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Chum Creek | Healesville | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | 15.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Chum Creek | Healesville | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,161/yr same for both | |
| Council | Yarra Ranges same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Chum Creek | Healesville | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Casey same for both | |
| Member | Aaron Violi same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Chum Creek | Healesville | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Chum Creek
Other comparisons with Healesville
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.