Chisholm vs Richardson
In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Chisholm, about half of households are couple families.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 6 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Chisholm
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (71/100 vs 63/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (22.8 km vs 24.8 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Chisholm
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (71/100 vs 63/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Richardson
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.7% vs 4.0%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Chisholm and Richardson drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Chisholm has more residents (5,268 vs 3,058); Chisholm has higher household incomes ($119,184 vs $106,236).
| Chisholm | Richardson | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,268 +42% vs other | 3,058 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.9% | +1.7% |
| Median age | 37 | 36 |
| Median household income | $119,184/yr +11% vs other | $106,236/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $410/wk +5% vs other | $391/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Chisholm | Richardson | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $890,000 | $830,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 18 days from 42 sales | 13 days from 21 sales |
Development activity
| Chisholm | Richardson | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,750 across Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Chisholm | Richardson | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.0% $720/wk on $935K | 4.7% $750/wk on $829K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within ACT
| Chisholm | Richardson | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 39% of ACT | Higher than 13% of ACT |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 66% of ACT | Higher than 53% of ACT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 1% of ACT | Higher than 5% of ACT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 26% of ACT | Higher than 38% of ACT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 33% of ACT | Higher than 79% of ACT |
Liveability
Chisholm scores higher overall (20 vs 13); Chisholm is more walkable (71 vs 63).
| Chisholm | Richardson | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D same for both | |
| Score | 20/100 | 13/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Richardson carries more flood risk (38 vs 20).
| Chisholm | Richardson | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 88/100 | High 90/100 |
| Crime | High 71/100 | High 73/100 |
| Flood | Low 20/100 | Low 38/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Chisholm | Richardson | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Chisholm
- Caroline Chisholm School Government · Secondary
- Caroline Chisholm School - Junior Campus Government · Primary
Schools in Richardson
- Richardson Primary School Government · Primary
Amenities in the suburb
| Chisholm | Richardson | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 3 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 0 |
| Childcare | 3 same for both | |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
Richardson sits further from the CBD (24.8 km vs 22.8 km).
| Chisholm | Richardson | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 71/100 | 63/100 |
| Distance to Canberra | 22.8 km | 24.8 km +9% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 27 min | 30 min |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 88.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 78.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0.5 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.4% postcode 2905 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 47 postcode 2905 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (80.1%).
Setting
| Chisholm | Richardson | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 630 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 609 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Chisholm | Richardson | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 47/100 | 50/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 3% 2,069 premises | 6% 1,198 premises |
Climate
| Chisholm | Richardson | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 686 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.2°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 0.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Chisholm | Richardson | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 7.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 11.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.32 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Chisholm | Richardson | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,105/yr same for both | |
| Council | Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Chisholm | Richardson | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bean same for both | |
| Member | David Smith same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Chisholm | Richardson | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | Not offered same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | None same for both | |
Tags
Chisholm
Richardson
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Chisholm
Other comparisons with Richardson
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.