Chillingham vs Hopkins Creek
Hopkins Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 46 against 53 in Chillingham. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Hopkins Creek, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Chillingham: a median of $905,000, against $501,000 in Hopkins Creek, though rent is higher in Hopkins Creek. On these figures, Chillingham tends to suit people living alone and older residents, while Hopkins Creek suits couples and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Hopkins Creek
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (0/100 vs 21/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (76% vs 52%)
- But Chillingham has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Hopkins Creek
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($501,000 vs $905,000)
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (22% vs 31%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Chillingham
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($285/wk vs $550/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (27% vs 40%)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Chillingham
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (28/100 vs 18/100)
- has a shorter drive in (533 min vs 552 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (810.8 km vs 818.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Chillingham
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (30% vs 19%)
- is more walkable (28/100 vs 18/100)
- But Hopkins Creek carries lower crime risk (0/100 vs 21/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Hopkins Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (23.0% vs -1.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Chillingham and Hopkins Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Hopkins Creek rents higher ($550/wk vs $285/wk); Chillingham has more residents (228 vs 139).
| Chillingham | Hopkins Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 228 +39% vs other | 139 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -1.7% | +23.0% |
| Median age | 53 | 46 |
| Median household income | $54,600/yr | $71,500/yr +31% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $285/wk | $550/wk +93% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.1%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Chillingham | Hopkins Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $905,000 | $501,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Hopkins Creek has more rural and farming land (80% vs 66%).
| Chillingham | Hopkins Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 66% | 80% |
| Other and special use | 30% | 19% |
| Environmental | 3% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Chillingham | Hopkins Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 331 across Tweed same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -50% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Chillingham | Hopkins Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 66% of NSW | Higher than 15% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 15% of NSW | Higher than 37% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 74% of NSW | Higher than 68% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 11% of NSW | Higher than 85% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 65% of NSW | Higher than 64% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 59% of NSW | Higher than 24% of NSW |
Liveability
Chillingham is more walkable (28 vs 18).
| Chillingham | Hopkins Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Chillingham carries more crime risk (21 vs 0); Chillingham carries more bushfire risk (56 vs 30).
| Chillingham | Hopkins Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 56/100 | Low 30/100 |
| Crime | Low 21/100 | None 0/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Chillingham | Hopkins Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Chillingham
- Chillingham Public School Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Hopkins Creek
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Chillingham | Hopkins Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 0 |
| Childcare | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 1 | 5 |
Mobility
Hopkins Creek sits further from the CBD (818.4 km vs 810.8 km).
| Chillingham | Hopkins Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 28/100 | 18/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 810.8 km | 818.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 533 min | 552 min |
| Public transport score | 25/100 Bus | 22/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 7.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 5.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2484 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 76 postcode 2484 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (94.8%).
Setting
| Chillingham | Hopkins Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 38 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 183 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 27.9 km | 29.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Chillingham | Hopkins Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 16/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 108 premises | 0% 27 premises |
Climate
| Chillingham | Hopkins Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,569 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 9.1°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Chillingham | Hopkins Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,745/yr same for both | |
| Council | Tweed same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Chillingham | Hopkins Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Richmond same for both | |
| Member | Justine Elliot same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Chillingham | Hopkins Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Chillingham
Other comparisons with Hopkins Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.