Chifley vs Malabar
Chifley is the younger of the two, with a median age of 42 against 46 in Malabar. In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Chifley, most households are couple families. In Malabar, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Malabar: a median of $3.2 million, against $2.69 million in Chifley, though rent is higher in Chifley. On these figures, Chifley tends to suit families with children, couples, and buyers on a tighter budget, while Malabar suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Chifley has more childcare (8 vs 5)
- Malabar has more parks and reserves (10 vs 3)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Chifley
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (32% vs 50%)
- has cheaper houses ($2,690,000 vs $3,200,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Malabar
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($150/wk vs $400/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (8% vs 17%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Chifley has a shorter drive in (24 min vs 29 min)
- Malabar is more walkable (75/100 vs 60/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Malabar
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (21% vs 16%)
- is more walkable (75/100 vs 60/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Chifley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (7.9% vs -13.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Chifley and Malabar drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Chifley rents higher ($400/wk vs $150/wk); Malabar has more residents (4,714 vs 3,490).
| Chifley | Malabar | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,490 | 4,714 +35% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +7.9% | -13.0% |
| Median age | 42 | 46 |
| Median household income | $120,172/yr +23% vs other | $93,080/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $400/wk +62% vs other | $150/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (12.6%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Chifley | Malabar | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,690,000 | $3,200,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $2,157,500 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 26 days from 22 sales | 28 days from 11 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
16 vs 8 sales
23 vs 13 sales
Zoning mix
Malabar has more land zoned for conservation (20% vs 6%).
| Chifley | Malabar | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 70% | 23% |
| Parks and recreation | 11% | 39% |
| Environmental | 6% | 20% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 13% | 18% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Chifley | Malabar | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 455 across Randwick same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -26% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Chifley | Malabar | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 92% of NSW | Higher than 95% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 84% of NSW | Higher than 60% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 85% of NSW | Higher than 90% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 12% of NSW | Higher than 3% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 90% of NSW | Higher than 91% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 93% of NSW | Higher than 94% of NSW |
Liveability
Malabar is more walkable (75 vs 60); Chifley scores higher overall (71 vs 63).
| Chifley | Malabar | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | B |
| Score | 71/100 | 63/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Malabar carries more bushfire risk (30 vs 0).
| Chifley | Malabar | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 30/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 61/100 | Moderate 63/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 22 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Chifley | Malabar | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 2 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 The University of New South Wales, 6.5 km | 2 The University of New South Wales, 6.2 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.8% | 2.1% |
Schools in Chifley
- Chifley Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Matraville Sports High School Government · Secondary below peers
Schools in Malabar
- Malabar Public School Government · Primary above peers
- St Andrew's Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Chifley | Malabar | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 10 |
| Childcare | 8 | 5 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Beaches | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
| Chifley | Malabar | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 60/100 | 75/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 15.3 km | 16.4 km +7% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 24 min | 29 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 126.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 198.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.6% postcode 2036 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 19 postcode 2036 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (48.6%).
Setting
| Chifley | Malabar | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 30 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 16 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.2 km 1.3 km to a named beach | 125 m 144 m to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Chifley | Malabar | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 87/100 | 88/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fibre to the curb |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 40% 1,321 premises | 41% 1,595 premises |
Climate
| Chifley | Malabar | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,129 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 27.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 9.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Chifley | Malabar | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 16.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.64 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Chifley | Malabar | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,641/yr same for both | |
| Council | Randwick same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Chifley | Malabar | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Kingsford Smith same for both | |
| Member | Matt Thistlethwaite same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Chifley | Malabar | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Chifley
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Chifley
Other comparisons with Malabar
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.