Chifley vs Fisher
Chifley is the younger of the two, with a median age of 37 against 40 in Fisher. In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Fisher, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Chifley: a median of $1.09 million, against $950,000 in Fisher, and rent is higher there too. Chifley is closer to the city centre: 13.1 km, against 16.8 km. On these figures, Chifley tends to suit young adults, while Fisher suits families with children.
Chifley and Fisher are both affluent ACT suburbs with similar socio-economic standing, but they suit different priorities. Chifley is closer to the CBD at 13.1 km versus Fisher's 16.8 km, and offers higher median household income ($122,044 versus $118,300) and lower house prices ($1,082,500 versus $919,000). Fisher has notably better walkability (73 versus 60) and liveability scores (66 versus 61), plus a lower crime risk rating (15 versus 34). If proximity to the city and stronger household income appeal to you, Chifley fits well; if walkable neighbourhoods and safety are priorities, Fisher's advantages are clearer.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Fisher
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (15/100 vs 34/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (83% vs 68%)
- is already more of a family suburb (60% vs 50%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Fisher
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($950,000 vs $1,092,500)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Chifley has a bigger rental market to choose from (33% vs 20%)
- Fisher has cheaper rent ($415/wk vs $450/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Chifley sits closer to the CBD (13.1 km vs 16.8 km)
- Fisher is more walkable (73/100 vs 60/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Fisher
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (15/100 vs 34/100)
- is more walkable (73/100 vs 60/100)
- But Chifley has more units and townhouses to downsize into (32% vs 17%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Chifley and Fisher drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Fisher skews older (40 vs 37).
| Chifley | Fisher | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,680 | 3,219 +20% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +11.3% | +7.2% |
| Median age | 37 | 40 |
| Median household income | $122,044/yr +3% vs other | $118,300/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $450/wk +8% vs other | $415/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Chifley | Fisher | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,092,500 | $950,000 |
| Median unit price | $432,500 | $442,500 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 22 days from 24 sales | 21 days from 42 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
35 vs 41 sales
18 vs 32 sales
Development activity
| Chifley | Fisher | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,750 across Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Chifley | Fisher | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.7% $1,075/wk on $1.18M | 4.4% $800/wk on $945K |
| Units | 8.1% $550/wk on $354K | — |
Ranking within ACT
| Chifley | Fisher | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 47% of ACT | Higher than 38% of ACT |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 46% of ACT | Higher than 73% of ACT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 50% of ACT | Higher than 75% of ACT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 28% of ACT | Higher than 18% of ACT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 82% of ACT | Higher than 63% of ACT |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 98% of ACT | — |
Liveability
Fisher is more walkable (73 vs 60); Fisher scores higher overall (55 vs 48).
| Chifley | Fisher | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 48/100 | 55/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Chifley carries more crime risk (34 vs 15).
| Chifley | Fisher | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 99/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 34/100 | Low 15/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Chifley | Fisher | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 UNSW Canberra, 7.7 km | 1 UNSW Canberra, 9.6 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.5% | 1.6% |
Amenities in the suburb
| Chifley | Fisher | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 same for both | |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| GPs | 1 same for both | |
Mobility
Fisher sits further from the CBD (16.8 km vs 13.1 km).
| Chifley | Fisher | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 60/100 | 73/100 |
| Distance to Canberra | 13.1 km | 16.8 km +28% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 19 min | 20 min |
| Public transport score | 59/100 Bus | 78/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 16.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 45.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 3.4% postcode 2606 | 4.0% postcode 2611 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 20 postcode 2606 | 52 postcode 2611 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.1%).
Setting
| Chifley | Fisher | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 621 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 625 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Chifley | Fisher | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 47/100 | 45/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 2% 1,267 premises | 1% 1,378 premises |
Climate
| Chifley | Fisher | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 686 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.2°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 0.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Chifley | Fisher | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 7.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 11.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.32 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Chifley | Fisher | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,105/yr same for both | |
| Council | Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Chifley | Fisher | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bean same for both | |
| Member | David Smith same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Chifley | Fisher | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | Not offered same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | None same for both | |
Tags
Chifley
Fisher
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Chifley
Other comparisons with Fisher
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.