Cherokee vs Mount Macedon
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Cherokee tends to suit couples, while Mount Macedon suits families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Macedon
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (6 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (21/100 vs 77/100)
- has more schools inside the suburb (2 vs 0)
- But Cherokee is already more of a family suburb (100% vs 68%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Cherokee
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (17% vs 23%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Cherokee
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($300/wk vs $330/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Mount Macedon
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (17/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (56 min vs 63 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mount Macedon
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (17/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (21/100 vs 77/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Cherokee
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (21.4% vs 8.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cherokee and Mount Macedon drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Macedon has more residents (1,450 vs 68); Cherokee has higher household incomes ($188,448 vs $137,644).
| Cherokee | Mount Macedon | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 68 | 1,450 +2032% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +21.4% | +8.6% |
| Median age | 49 | 48 |
| Median household income | $188,448/yr +27% vs other | $137,644/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk | $330/wk +10% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.8%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cherokee | Mount Macedon | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $1,420,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $1,800,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 56 days from 14 sales |
Zoning mix
Cherokee has more land zoned for conservation (77% vs 48%).
| Cherokee | Mount Macedon | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 77% | 48% |
| Parks and recreation | 23% | 49% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Cherokee | Mount Macedon | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 331 across Macedon Ranges same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +80% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Cherokee | Mount Macedon | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.8% $1,900/wk on $2.05M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Cherokee | Mount Macedon | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 99% of VIC | Higher than 96% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 5% of VIC | Higher than 78% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 65% of VIC | Higher than 96% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 16% of VIC | Higher than 79% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 96% of VIC |
Liveability
Mount Macedon is more walkable (17 vs 0).
| Cherokee | Mount Macedon | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 66/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Mount Macedon carries more flood risk (12 vs 0); Cherokee carries more crime risk (77 vs 21).
| Cherokee | Mount Macedon | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 83/100 | High 85/100 |
| Crime | High 77/100 | Low 21/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 | Low 12/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Cherokee | Mount Macedon | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Cherokee
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Mount Macedon
- Braemar College Independent · Combined above peers
- Mount Macedon Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Cherokee | Mount Macedon | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 6 |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 4 | 13 |
Mobility
| Cherokee | Mount Macedon | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 17/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 65.9 km +2% vs other | 64.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 63 min | 56 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 3434 | 2.2% postcode 3441 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 49 postcode 3434 | 32 postcode 3441 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (62.5%).
Setting
| Cherokee | Mount Macedon | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 682 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 690 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Cherokee | Mount Macedon | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 19/100 | 69/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 32 premises | 51% 655 premises |
Climate
| Cherokee | Mount Macedon | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 778 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Cherokee | Mount Macedon | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,065/yr same for both | |
| Council | Macedon Ranges same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Cherokee | Mount Macedon | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mcewen same for both | |
| Member | Rob Mitchell same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cherokee | Mount Macedon | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cherokee
Other comparisons with Mount Macedon
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.