Cheltenham vs Epping
Epping is the younger of the two, with a median age of 36 against 46 in Cheltenham. In both, most households own their home and most households are couple families. In Cheltenham, the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Epping, about half of homes are flats or apartments. Houses cost more in Cheltenham: a median of $2.85 million, against $2.49 million in Epping, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Cheltenham tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Cheltenham has more separate houses rather than flats (96% vs 43%)
- Epping has more schools inside the suburb (8 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Epping
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper units ($804,000 vs $1,350,000)
- has cheaper houses ($2,486,900 vs $2,847,500)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Epping
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (43% vs 9%)
- has cheaper rent ($500/wk vs $695/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Epping
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (96/100 vs 63/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Epping
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (58% vs 4%)
- has more GPs (5 vs 0)
- is more walkable (96/100 vs 63/100)
- But Cheltenham has more residents already 65 and over (20% vs 14%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Epping
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (24.8% vs -3.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cheltenham and Epping drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Epping has more residents (29,551 vs 2,166); Cheltenham has higher household incomes ($185,796 vs $116,636).
| Cheltenham | Epping | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,166 | 29,551 +1264% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -3.4% | +24.8% |
| Median age | 46 | 36 |
| Median household income | $185,796/yr +37% vs other | $116,636/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $695/wk +28% vs other | $500/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (27.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cheltenham | Epping | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,847,500 | $2,486,900 |
| Median unit price | $1,350,000 | $804,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 27 days from 7 sales | 24 days from 156 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
8 vs 54 sales
16 vs 72 sales
12 vs 64 sales
Zoning mix
| Cheltenham | Epping | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 63% | 84% |
| Environmental | 13% | 5% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 12% | 4% |
| Parks and recreation | 11% | 4% |
| Commercial | 0% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Cheltenham | Epping | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 260 across Hornsby | 2,888 across Parramatta |
| Approvals change year on year | -79% | +154% |
Gross rental yield
| Cheltenham | Epping | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 2.4% $1,000/wk on $2.2M |
| Units | — | 5.2% $780/wk on $779K |
Ranking within NSW
| Cheltenham | Epping | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 93% of NSW | Higher than 92% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 99% of NSW | Higher than 80% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 84% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 86% of NSW | Higher than 98% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 29% of NSW | Higher than 11% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 99% of NSW | Higher than 97% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 84% of NSW | Higher than 88% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 5% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 75% of NSW |
Liveability
Epping is more walkable (96 vs 63).
| Cheltenham | Epping | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | A+ |
| Score | 87/100 same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Epping carries more crime risk (39 vs 28).
| Cheltenham | Epping | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 28/100 | Low 39/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Cheltenham | Epping | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 8 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 4 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Macquarie University Wallumattagal Campus at North Ryde, 5.2 km | 3 Macquarie University Wallumattagal Campus at North Ryde, 4.8 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 5.8% | 4.2% |
Schools in Cheltenham
- Cheltenham Girls High School Government · Secondary above peers
Schools in Epping
- Epping Heights Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Epping Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Epping West Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Our Lady Help of Christians Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Ngarala Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Arden Anglican School, Epping campus Independent · Secondary
Amenities in the suburb
| Cheltenham | Epping | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 21 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 19 |
| Childcare | 3 | 20 |
| GPs | 0 | 5 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 3 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 9 | 6 |
Mobility
| Cheltenham | Epping | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 63/100 | 96/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 22 km | 22.8 km +4% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 23 min | 25 min |
| Public transport score | 87/100 Rail · Bus | 94/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 23.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 458.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 3.7% postcode 2119 | 2.8% postcode 2121 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 34 postcode 2119 | 22 postcode 2121 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (62.9%).
Setting
| Cheltenham | Epping | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 108 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 109 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 16.7 km | 16.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Cheltenham | Epping | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 75/100 | 79/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 1% 758 premises | 24% 11,433 premises |
Climate
| Cheltenham | Epping | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,176 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Cheltenham | Epping | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.23 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Cheltenham | Epping | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,488/yr | $1,103/yr |
| Council | Hornsby | Parramatta |
Federal electorate
| Cheltenham | Epping | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Berowra same for both | |
| Member | Julian Leeser same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cheltenham | Epping | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Cheltenham
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cheltenham
Other comparisons with Epping
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.