Chelsea Heights vs Patterson Lakes
Chelsea Heights is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 46 in Patterson Lakes. In both, the large majority of households own their home, most homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Patterson Lakes: a median of $1.34 million, against $1.01 million in Chelsea Heights. Chelsea Heights is closer to the city centre: 36.8 km, against 46.7 km. On these figures, Chelsea Heights tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Chelsea Heights
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (79% vs 60%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Chelsea Heights has cheaper houses ($1,009,250 vs $1,338,000)
- Patterson Lakes has cheaper units ($675,000 vs $746,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Chelsea Heights
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (36.8 km vs 46.7 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Patterson Lakes
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (40% vs 21%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Chelsea Heights and Patterson Lakes drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Patterson Lakes has more residents (7,793 vs 5,393); Patterson Lakes skews older (46 vs 40).
| Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,393 | 7,793 +45% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +1.1% | +3.0% |
| Median age | 40 | 46 |
| Median household income | $97,084/yr | $100,464/yr +3% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $412/wk | $430/wk +4% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,009,250 | $1,338,000 |
| Median unit price | $746,000 | $675,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 22 days from 22 sales | 24 days from 65 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
9 vs 25 sales
5 vs 13 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
51 vs 53 sales
25 vs 51 sales
5 vs 21 sales
Zoning mix
Chelsea Heights has more commercially zoned land (13% vs 1%).
| Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 44% | 61% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 37% | 24% |
| Commercial | 13% | 1% |
| Parks and recreation | 4% | 9% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 5% |
| Industrial | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 465 across Kingston (Vic.) same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -36% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.3% $792/wk on $960K | 3.9% $1,200/wk on $1.6M |
| Units | — | 4.7% $620/wk on $679K |
Ranking within VIC
| Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 69% of VIC | Higher than 75% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 67% of VIC | Higher than 73% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 90% of VIC | Higher than 91% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 39% of VIC | Higher than 29% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 80% of VIC same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 96% of VIC | Higher than 94% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 85% of VIC | Higher than 61% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 48% of VIC |
Liveability
| Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 58/100 same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
| Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 56/100 | Moderate 60/100 |
| Flood | High 79/100 | High 86/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 5 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Chelsea Heights
- Chelsea Heights Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Patterson Lakes
- Patterson Lakes Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 4 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 same for both | |
| Childcare | 2 | 3 |
| GPs | 2 same for both | |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 2 |
| Waterways | 0 | 4 |
Mobility
Patterson Lakes sits further from the CBD (46.7 km vs 36.8 km).
| Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 69/100 | 74/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 36.8 km | 46.7 km +27% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 44 min | 42 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 77/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 111.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 43.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.1% postcode 3196 | 1.1% postcode 3197 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 25 postcode 3196 | 29 postcode 3197 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (64.7%).
Setting
| Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 9 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 6 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 2.2 km 2.3 km to a named beach | 2.0 km 2.2 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 90/100 | 87/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fibre to the curb |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 50% 2,428 premises | 39% 3,612 premises |
Climate
| Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 644 mm | — |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.0°C | 24.5°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.9°C | 8.3°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 20.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.98 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,940/yr same for both | |
| Council | Kingston (Vic.) same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Isaacs | Dunkley |
| Member | Mark Dreyfus | Jodie Belyea |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Chelsea Heights
Other comparisons with Patterson Lakes
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.