Chelona vs Rosella
Chelona is the younger of the two, with a median age of 37 against 44 in Rosella. In both, the large majority of households own their home. In Chelona, the large majority of households are couple families. On these figures, Chelona tends to suit families with children and couples, while Rosella suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Chelona
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (24/100 vs 71/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (24% vs 10%)
- is already more of a family suburb (86% vs 58%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Rosella
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($200/wk vs $346/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (10% vs 18%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Chelona
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (23/100 vs 13/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (951.5 km vs 953.7 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Chelona
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (24/100 vs 71/100)
- is more walkable (23/100 vs 13/100)
- But Rosella has more units and townhouses to downsize into (90% vs 79%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Chelona
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (20.0% vs -8.2%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Chelona and Rosella drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Chelona rents higher ($346/wk vs $200/wk); Chelona has more residents (120 vs 78).
| Chelona | Rosella | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 120 +35% vs other | 78 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +20.0% | -8.2% |
| Median age | 37 | 44 |
| Median household income | $101,816/yr +1% vs other | $100,724/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $346/wk +42% vs other | $200/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.5%).
Development activity
| Chelona | Rosella | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 574 across Mackay same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -6% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Chelona | Rosella | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 75% of QLD same for both | |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 80% of QLD | Higher than 75% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 41% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 59% of QLD | Higher than 65% of QLD |
Liveability
Chelona is more walkable (23 vs 13).
| Chelona | Rosella | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Rosella carries more crime risk (71 vs 24).
| Chelona | Rosella | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 24/100 | High 71/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Chelona | Rosella | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Chelona
- Chelona State School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Rosella
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Chelona | Rosella | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 4 | 0 |
Mobility
Rosella sits further from the CBD (953.7 km vs 951.5 km).
| Chelona | Rosella | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 23/100 | 13/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 951.5 km | 953.7 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 648 min | 649 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 4740 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 4740 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (100.0%).
Setting
| Chelona | Rosella | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 11 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 12 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 4.4 km | 4.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Chelona | Rosella | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 39 premises same for both | |
Climate
| Chelona | Rosella | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,517 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.8°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 12.4°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Chelona | Rosella | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Chelona | Rosella | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,873/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mackay same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Chelona | Rosella | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Capricornia same for both | |
| Member | Michelle Landry same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Chelona | Rosella | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Chelona
Rosella
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Chelona
Other comparisons with Rosella
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.