Chatswood West vs Roseville
In both, most households own their home, most homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Roseville: a median of $3.99 million, against $2.47 million in Chatswood West, though rent is higher in Chatswood West. On these figures, Chatswood West tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Roseville
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (10 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (16 vs 5)
- has more schools rated above their peers (2 vs 0)
- But Chatswood West has more separate houses rather than flats (94% vs 69%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Chatswood West
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($2,468,333 vs $3,990,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Roseville
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (26% vs 15%)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (19% vs 24%)
- has cheaper rent ($600/wk vs $750/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Roseville
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (80/100 vs 62/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Roseville
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (31% vs 6%)
- has more GPs (2 vs 0)
- is more walkable (80/100 vs 62/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Chatswood West and Roseville drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Roseville has more residents (10,340 vs 1,521); Chatswood West rents higher ($750/wk vs $600/wk).
| Chatswood West | Roseville | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,521 | 10,340 +580% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +1.5% | +2.6% |
| Median age | 42 | 40 |
| Median household income | $162,292/yr | $166,400/yr +3% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $750/wk +20% vs other | $600/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (27.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (11.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Chatswood West | Roseville | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,468,333 | $3,990,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $1,075,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 23 days from 94 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
7 vs 24 sales
5 vs 50 sales
Zoning mix
Chatswood West has more land zoned for conservation (44% vs 9%).
| Chatswood West | Roseville | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 37% | 76% |
| Environmental | 44% | 9% |
| Parks and recreation | 7% | 6% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 4% | 5% |
| Industrial | 0% | 2% |
| Commercial | 0% | 1% |
| Planning zones cover 92% of Chatswood West and 100% of Roseville. The rest is unzoned land such as water or road reserve. | ||
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Chatswood West | Roseville | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 249 across Willoughby | 908 across Ku-ring-gai |
| Approvals change year on year | +458% | +0% |
Gross rental yield
| Chatswood West | Roseville | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 2.3% $1,650/wk on $3.67M |
| Units | — | 4.8% $878/wk on $950K |
Ranking within NSW
| Chatswood West | Roseville | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 90% of NSW | Higher than 97% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 97% of NSW same for both | |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 85% of NSW | Higher than 92% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 32% of NSW | Higher than 10% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 99% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 83% of NSW | Higher than 92% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 5% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 58% of NSW |
Liveability
Roseville is more walkable (80 vs 62); Roseville scores higher overall (79 vs 70).
| Chatswood West | Roseville | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A same for both | |
| Score | 70/100 | 79/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Chatswood West carries more bushfire risk (78 vs 52).
| Chatswood West | Roseville | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 78/100 | Moderate 52/100 |
| Crime | Low 18/100 | Low 27/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Chatswood West | Roseville | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Macquarie University Wallumattagal Campus at North Ryde, 3.5 km | 3 Macquarie University Wallumattagal Campus at North Ryde, 5.1 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 4.0% | 4.6% |
Schools in Chatswood West
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Roseville
- Roseville College Independent · Combined above peers
- Roseville Public School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Chatswood West | Roseville | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 12 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 16 |
| Childcare | 0 | 10 |
| GPs | 0 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 6 | 7 |
Mobility
| Chatswood West | Roseville | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 62/100 | 80/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 13.3 km +10% vs other | 12 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 20 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 94/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 44.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 300.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 4.0% postcode 2067 | 4.7% postcode 2069 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 11 postcode 2067 | 30 postcode 2069 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (64.3%).
Setting
| Chatswood West | Roseville | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 35 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 87 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 8.2 km 4.9 km to a named beach | 6.7 km 4.0 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Chatswood West | Roseville | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 75/100 | 84/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 551 premises | 35% 4,339 premises |
Climate
| Chatswood West | Roseville | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,176 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Chatswood West | Roseville | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.23 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Chatswood West | Roseville | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,275/yr | $1,626/yr |
| Council | Willoughby | Ku-ring-gai |
Federal electorate
| Chatswood West | Roseville | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bennelong | Bradfield |
| Member | Jerome Laxale | Nicolette Boele |
| Party | Australian Labor Party | Independent |
First Home Owner Grant
| Chatswood West | Roseville | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Chatswood West
Roseville
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Chatswood West
Other comparisons with Roseville
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.