Chatsbury vs Greenwich Park
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Chatsbury: a median of $2.4 million, against $1.01 million in Greenwich Park, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Chatsbury tends to suit people living alone, while Greenwich Park suits buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Greenwich Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (71% vs 60%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Chatsbury leaves households under less mortgage stress (18% vs 26%)
- Greenwich Park has cheaper houses ($1,010,000 vs $2,400,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Greenwich Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($275/wk vs $667/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (17% vs 38%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Greenwich Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (181.5 km vs 218.4 km)
- has a shorter drive in (138 min vs 149 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Greenwich Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (35.0% vs -5.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Chatsbury and Greenwich Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Chatsbury rents higher ($667/wk vs $275/wk); Greenwich Park has more residents (162 vs 86).
| Chatsbury | Greenwich Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 86 | 162 +88% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -5.5% | +35.0% |
| Median age | 54 | 52 |
| Median household income | $92,612/yr +9% vs other | $84,448/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $667/wk +59% vs other | $275/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (27.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.4%).
Property market
| Chatsbury | Greenwich Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,400,000 | $1,010,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Chatsbury has more rural and farming land (93% vs 80%); Greenwich Park has more land zoned for conservation (20% vs 7%).
| Chatsbury | Greenwich Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 93% | 80% |
| Environmental | 7% | 20% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Chatsbury | Greenwich Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 44 across Upper Lachlan same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +175% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Chatsbury | Greenwich Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 89% of NSW | Higher than 52% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 59% of NSW | Higher than 52% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 47% of NSW | Higher than 17% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 8% of NSW | Higher than 50% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 48% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 9% of NSW | Higher than 24% of NSW |
Liveability
| Chatsbury | Greenwich Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
| Chatsbury | Greenwich Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 71/100 | High 72/100 |
| Crime | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Chatsbury | Greenwich Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Chatsbury | Greenwich Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 5 | 4 |
Mobility
Chatsbury sits further from the CBD (218.4 km vs 181.5 km).
| Chatsbury | Greenwich Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 5/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 218.4 km +17% vs other | 181.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 149 min | 138 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 2580 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 41 postcode 2580 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.6%).
Setting
| Chatsbury | Greenwich Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 839 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 757 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Chatsbury | Greenwich Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 | 16/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 33 premises | 0% 58 premises |
Climate
| Chatsbury | Greenwich Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 860 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 1.3°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Chatsbury | Greenwich Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 10.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.36 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Chatsbury | Greenwich Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $636/yr same for both | |
| Council | Upper Lachlan same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Chatsbury | Greenwich Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Riverina same for both | |
| Member | Michael Mccormack same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Chatsbury | Greenwich Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Chatsbury
Other comparisons with Greenwich Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.