Charlton vs Cotswold Hills
In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Charlton tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Cotswold Hills
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (5 vs 1)
- carries lower crime risk (70/100 vs 99/100)
- But Charlton is already more of a family suburb (84% vs 74%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Cotswold Hills
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (19% vs 37%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Charlton
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (33% vs 17%)
- has cheaper rent ($280/wk vs $390/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Cotswold Hills
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (23/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (134 km vs 138 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Cotswold Hills
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (23/100 vs 0/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (19% vs 12%)
- carries lower crime risk (70/100 vs 99/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Cotswold Hills
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (26.8% vs -10.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Charlton and Cotswold Hills drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Cotswold Hills has more residents (1,620 vs 107); Cotswold Hills rents higher ($390/wk vs $280/wk).
| Charlton | Cotswold Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 107 | 1,620 +1414% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -10.8% | +26.8% |
| Median age | 44 | 42 |
| Median household income | $84,500/yr | $114,192/yr +35% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $280/wk | $390/wk +39% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.2%).
Property market
| Charlton | Cotswold Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $900,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $1,065,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 42 days from 9 sales |
Development activity
| Charlton | Cotswold Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,513 across Toowoomba same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -25% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Charlton | Cotswold Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.1% $670/wk on $857K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Charlton | Cotswold Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 57% of QLD | Higher than 85% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 33% of QLD | Higher than 80% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 71% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 67% of QLD | Higher than 93% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 59% of QLD |
Liveability
Cotswold Hills is more walkable (23 vs 0).
| Charlton | Cotswold Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 57/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Charlton carries more crime risk (99 vs 70).
| Charlton | Cotswold Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 99/100 | High 70/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 6 within 5 km |
Schools
| Charlton | Cotswold Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | None | 1 USQ (Toowoomba), 6.9 km |
Amenities in the suburb
| Charlton | Cotswold Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 5 |
| Fuel stations | 4 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
Charlton sits further from the CBD (138 km vs 134 km).
| Charlton | Cotswold Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 23/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 138 km +3% vs other | 134 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 104 min same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 4350 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 41 postcode 4350 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (85.1%).
Setting
| Charlton | Cotswold Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 496 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 577 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Charlton | Cotswold Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 36/100 | 84/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 4% 68 premises | 70% 897 premises |
Climate
| Charlton | Cotswold Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 577 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Charlton | Cotswold Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 12.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Charlton | Cotswold Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,618/yr same for both | |
| Council | Toowoomba same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Charlton | Cotswold Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Groom same for both | |
| Member | Garth Hamilton same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Charlton | Cotswold Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Charlton
Other comparisons with Cotswold Hills
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.