Charlestown vs Wattle Camp
Charlestown is the younger of the two, with a median age of 45 against 52 in Wattle Camp. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Wattle Camp, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Wattle Camp tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Charlestown
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (64% vs 42%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Wattle Camp
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (21% vs 32%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Charlestown
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (24% vs 8%)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (20% vs 27%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Wattle Camp
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (175 min vs 211 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (217.4 km vs 233.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Charlestown
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (21.5% vs 5.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Charlestown and Wattle Camp drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Wattle Camp has more residents (543 vs 79); Charlestown has higher household incomes ($58,448 vs $45,604).
| Charlestown | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79 | 543 +587% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +21.5% | +5.0% |
| Median age | 45 | 52 |
| Median household income | $58,448/yr +22% vs other | $45,604/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $225/wk | $235/wk +4% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.2%).
Property market
| Charlestown | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $502,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $260,750 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 60 days from 3 sales |
Development activity
| Charlestown | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 198 across South Burnett same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -18% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Charlestown | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 20% of QLD | Higher than 7% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 28% of QLD | Higher than 1% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | — | Higher than 11% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 39% of QLD | Higher than 48% of QLD |
Liveability
| Charlestown | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 12/100 |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Charlestown carries more bushfire risk (60 vs 37).
| Charlestown | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 60/100 | Low 37/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 63/100 | Moderate 67/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Charlestown | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Charlestown | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 15 | 1 |
Mobility
Charlestown sits further from the CBD (233.5 km vs 217.4 km).
| Charlestown | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 233.5 km +7% vs other | 217.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 211 min | 175 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 4608 | 0.1% postcode 4615 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 62 postcode 4608 | 67 postcode 4615 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (83.2%).
Setting
| Charlestown | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 409 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 368 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Charlestown | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 28/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 37 premises | 0% 292 premises |
Council rates
| Charlestown | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,401/yr same for both | |
| Council | South Burnett same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Charlestown | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Flynn | Maranoa |
| Member | Colin Boyce | David Littleproud |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Charlestown | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Charlestown
Other comparisons with Wattle Camp
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.