Chambers Flat vs Logan Village
Logan Village is the younger of the two, with a median age of 42 against 47 in Chambers Flat. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Logan Village, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Logan Village: a median of $1.2 million, against $1.01 million in Chambers Flat, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Chambers Flat tends to suit people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget, while Logan Village suits families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Logan Village
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (4 vs 1)
- is already more of a family suburb (75% vs 56%)
- But Chambers Flat has more parks and reserves (9 vs 6)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Logan Village
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (23% vs 33%)
- has cheaper land ($995,000 vs $1,325,000)
- But Chambers Flat has cheaper houses ($1,010,000 vs $1,200,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Chambers Flat
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (25% vs 11%)
- has cheaper rent ($270/wk vs $455/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Logan Village
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (44.1 km vs 46.2 km)
- But Chambers Flat has a shorter drive in (41 min vs 47 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Logan Village
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- has more GPs (2 vs 0)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Chambers Flat
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (3.3% vs 2.7%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Chambers Flat and Logan Village drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Logan Village has more residents (5,316 vs 2,718); Logan Village rents higher ($455/wk vs $270/wk).
| Chambers Flat | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,718 | 5,316 +96% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +16.6% | +20.4% |
| Median age | 47 | 42 |
| Median household income | $70,512/yr | $106,548/yr +51% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $270/wk | $455/wk +69% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Chambers Flat | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,010,000 | $1,200,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $1,325,000 | $995,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 32 days from 30 sales | 37 days from 40 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
7 vs 21 sales
38 vs 52 sales
12 vs 15 sales
5 vs 9 sales
Development activity
| Chambers Flat | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 4,950 across Logan same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -8% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Chambers Flat | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.3% $770/wk on $1.2M | 2.7% $672/wk on $1.3M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Chambers Flat | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 38% of QLD | — |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 3% of QLD | Higher than 72% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 76% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 73% of QLD | Higher than 77% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 19% of QLD | Higher than 7% of QLD |
Liveability
Logan Village is more walkable (10 vs 0); Chambers Flat scores higher overall (42 vs 35).
| Chambers Flat | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 42/100 | 35/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Logan Village carries more bushfire risk (50 vs 0).
| Chambers Flat | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 50/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 67/100 | High 76/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Chambers Flat | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Chambers Flat
- King's Christian College - Chambers Flat Campus Independent · Combined
Schools in Logan Village
- Logan Village State School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Chambers Flat | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 6 |
| Childcare | 1 | 4 |
| GPs | 0 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 3 |
| Waterways | 7 | 14 |
Mobility
Chambers Flat sits further from the CBD (46.2 km vs 44.1 km).
| Chambers Flat | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 10/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 46.2 km +5% vs other | 44.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 41 min | 47 min |
| Public transport score | 28/100 Bus | 68/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 3.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 23.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 18 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 4133 | 0.8% postcode 4207 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 77 postcode 4133 | 70 postcode 4207 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (77.7%).
Setting
| Chambers Flat | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 22 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 31 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 22.0 km | 19.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Chambers Flat | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 62/100 | 67/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 40% 1,039 premises | 42% 2,122 premises |
Climate
| Chambers Flat | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,032 mm | 1,682 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.5°C | — |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.9°C | — |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Chambers Flat | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 13.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.27 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Chambers Flat | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,681/yr same for both | |
| Council | Logan same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Chambers Flat | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Forde | Wright |
| Member | Rowan Holzberger | Scott Buchholz |
| Party | Australian Labor Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland |
First Home Owner Grant
| Chambers Flat | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Chambers Flat
Other comparisons with Logan Village
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.