Chambers Flat vs Logan Reserve
Logan Reserve is the younger of the two, with a median age of 27 against 47 in Chambers Flat. In both, the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Chambers Flat, most households own their home. In Logan Reserve, about half of households rent and about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Chambers Flat: a median of $1.01 million, against $865,000 in Logan Reserve, though rent is higher in Logan Reserve. Logan Reserve is closer to the city centre: 33.4 km, against 46.2 km. On these figures, Chambers Flat tends to suit people living alone and older residents, while Logan Reserve suits renters, young adults, and families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Logan Reserve
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (5 vs 1)
- has more parks and reserves (15 vs 9)
- is already more of a family suburb (74% vs 56%)
- But Chambers Flat carries lower crime risk (67/100 vs 86/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Logan Reserve
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper land ($842,500 vs $1,325,000)
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (22% vs 33%)
- has cheaper houses ($865,000 vs $1,010,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Chambers Flat has cheaper rent ($270/wk vs $390/wk)
- Logan Reserve has a bigger rental market to choose from (49% vs 25%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Logan Reserve
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (36/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (33.4 km vs 46.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Chambers Flat
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (22% vs 6%)
- carries lower crime risk (67/100 vs 86/100)
- But Logan Reserve is more walkable (36/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Logan Reserve
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- is growing faster (99.3% vs 16.6%)
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (3.9% vs 3.3%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Chambers Flat and Logan Reserve drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Logan Reserve has more residents (7,016 vs 2,718); Chambers Flat skews older (47 vs 27).
| Chambers Flat | Logan Reserve | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,718 | 7,016 +158% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +16.6% | +99.3% |
| Median age | 47 | 27 |
| Median household income | $70,512/yr | $94,536/yr +34% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $270/wk | $390/wk +44% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Chambers Flat | Logan Reserve | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,010,000 | $865,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $1,325,000 | $842,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 32 days from 30 sales | 26 days from 231 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
7 vs 29 sales
38 vs 216 sales
12 vs 52 sales
5 vs 8 sales
Development activity
| Chambers Flat | Logan Reserve | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 4,950 across Logan same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -8% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Chambers Flat | Logan Reserve | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.3% $770/wk on $1.2M | 3.9% $675/wk on $900K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Chambers Flat | Logan Reserve | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 38% of QLD | Higher than 68% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 3% of QLD | Higher than 83% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 76% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 73% of QLD | Higher than 97% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 19% of QLD | Higher than 48% of QLD |
Liveability
Logan Reserve is more walkable (36 vs 0).
| Chambers Flat | Logan Reserve | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 42/100 same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Logan Reserve carries more crime risk (86 vs 67).
| Chambers Flat | Logan Reserve | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 67/100 | High 86/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Chambers Flat | Logan Reserve | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Chambers Flat
- King's Christian College - Chambers Flat Campus Independent · Combined
Schools in Logan Reserve
- Logan Reserve State School Government · Primary below peers
- Australian International Islamic College - Logan Reserve Campus Independent · Combined
Amenities in the suburb
| Chambers Flat | Logan Reserve | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 15 |
| Childcare | 1 | 5 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 7 | 10 |
Mobility
Chambers Flat sits further from the CBD (46.2 km vs 33.4 km).
| Chambers Flat | Logan Reserve | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 36/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 46.2 km +28% vs other | 33.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 41 min | 39 min |
| Public transport score | 28/100 Bus | 58/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 3.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 17.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 18 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 4133 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 77 postcode 4133 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (80.7%).
Setting
| Chambers Flat | Logan Reserve | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 22 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 34 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 22.0 km | 18.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Chambers Flat | Logan Reserve | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 62/100 | 94/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 40% 1,039 premises | 90% 3,618 premises |
Climate
| Chambers Flat | Logan Reserve | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,032 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Chambers Flat | Logan Reserve | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 13.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.27 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Chambers Flat | Logan Reserve | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,681/yr same for both | |
| Council | Logan same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Chambers Flat | Logan Reserve | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Forde same for both | |
| Member | Rowan Holzberger same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Chambers Flat | Logan Reserve | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Chambers Flat
Other comparisons with Logan Reserve
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.