Cessnock vs Mount View
Cessnock is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 49 in Mount View. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Mount View, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Mount View: a median of $1.72 million, against $700,000 in Cessnock, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Cessnock tends to suit people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget, while Mount View suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Cessnock
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (22 vs 0)
- has more childcare (7 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (4 vs 0)
- But Mount View is already more of a family suburb (75% vs 55%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Cessnock
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($700,000 vs $1,720,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Cessnock has cheaper rent ($320/wk vs $360/wk)
- Mount View leaves renters under less rental stress (16% vs 27%)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Cessnock
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (88/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (117 min vs 138 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (152.3 km vs 164.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Cessnock
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (88/100 vs 0/100)
- has more GPs (11 vs 0)
- But Mount View has more residents already 65 and over (28% vs 21%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Cessnock
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (7.4% vs -10.2%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cessnock and Mount View drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Cessnock has more residents (16,300 vs 114); Mount View has higher household incomes ($113,724 vs $61,984).
| Cessnock | Mount View | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,300 +99% vs other | 114 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +7.4% | -10.2% |
| Median age | 40 | 49 |
| Median household income | $61,984/yr | $113,724/yr +83% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $320/wk | $360/wk +12% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.5%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cessnock | Mount View | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $700,000 | $1,720,000 |
| Median unit price | $525,000 | — |
| Median land price | $500,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 22 days from 214 sales | — |
Zoning mix
Mount View has more rural and farming land (100% vs 53%).
| Cessnock | Mount View | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 53% | 100% |
| Residential | 24% | 0% |
| Environmental | 8% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 7% | 0% |
| Parks and recreation | 6% | 0% |
| Industrial | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Cessnock | Mount View | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 719 across Cessnock same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -31% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Cessnock | Mount View | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.1% $600/wk on $755K | — |
| Units | 4.5% $455/wk on $522K | — |
Ranking within NSW
| Cessnock | Mount View | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 24% of NSW | Higher than 80% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 24% of NSW | Higher than 79% of NSW |
| Schools | Higher than 9% of NSW | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 95% of NSW | Higher than 27% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 58% of NSW | Higher than 33% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 34% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 73% of NSW | Higher than 63% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 79% of NSW | — |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 44% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Cessnock is more walkable (88 vs 0).
| Cessnock | Mount View | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | — |
| Score | 24/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
| Cessnock | Mount View | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 58/100 | Moderate 65/100 |
| Crime | High 89/100 | High 92/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Cessnock | Mount View | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 4 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 4 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Cessnock
- Cessnock East Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Cessnock West Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Mount View High School Government · Secondary at peers
- St Patrick's Primary School Catholic · Primary at peers
Schools in Mount View
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Cessnock | Mount View | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 4 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 4 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 22 | 0 |
| Childcare | 7 | 0 |
| GPs | 11 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 4 | 0 |
| Hospitals | 1 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 7 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 4 | 0 |
| Waterways | 11 | 7 |
Mobility
Mount View sits further from the CBD (164.2 km vs 152.3 km).
| Cessnock | Mount View | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 88/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 152.3 km | 164.2 km +8% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 117 min | 138 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 2325 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 51 postcode 2325 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.6%).
Setting
| Cessnock | Mount View | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 94 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 255 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 37.4 km | 43.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Cessnock | Mount View | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 65/100 | 32/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 37% 7,577 premises | 5% 92 premises |
Climate
| Cessnock | Mount View | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 804 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 5.1°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Cessnock | Mount View | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.3 µg/m³ | — |
| PM10 | 17.5 µg/m³ | 22.6 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.72 pphm | — |
Council rates
| Cessnock | Mount View | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,405/yr same for both | |
| Council | Cessnock same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Cessnock | Mount View | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hunter same for both | |
| Member | Dan Repacholi same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cessnock | Mount View | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Cessnock
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cessnock
Other comparisons with Mount View
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.