Cedar Vale vs Mundoolun
Comparing Cedar Vale and Mundoolun, QLD: Cedar Vale has more residents (2,856 vs 1,836); Mundoolun carries more crime risk (41 vs 27); and Mundoolun sits further from the CBD (59.8 km vs 54.2 km).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Cedar Vale carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 41/100)
- Mundoolun has more parks and reserves (11 vs 6)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Cedar Vale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper land ($1,027,500 vs $1,237,500)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Cedar Vale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($460/wk vs $560/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Cedar Vale
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (49 min vs 55 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (54.2 km vs 59.8 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Cedar Vale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 41/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mundoolun
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (18.4% vs 2.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cedar Vale and Mundoolun drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Cedar Vale has more residents (2,856 vs 1,836); Mundoolun rents higher ($560/wk vs $460/wk).
| Cedar Vale | Mundoolun | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,856 +36% vs other | 1,836 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.3% | +18.4% |
| Median age | 37 | 39 |
| Median household income | $117,572/yr | $117,260/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $460/wk | $560/wk +22% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cedar Vale | Mundoolun | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,200,000 | $1,250,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $1,027,500 | $1,237,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 51 days from 10 sales | 36 days from 8 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
23 vs 22 sales
8 vs 12 sales
Development activity
| Cedar Vale | Mundoolun | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 4,950 across Logan same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -8% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Cedar Vale | Mundoolun | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 89% of QLD same for both | |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 77% of QLD | Higher than 72% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 61% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 72% of QLD | Higher than 71% of QLD |
Liveability
| Cedar Vale | Mundoolun | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 64/100 same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Mundoolun carries more crime risk (41 vs 27).
| Cedar Vale | Mundoolun | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 27/100 | Moderate 41/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Cedar Vale | Mundoolun | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Cedar Vale | Mundoolun | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 11 |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 2 | 6 |
Mobility
Mundoolun sits further from the CBD (59.8 km vs 54.2 km).
| Cedar Vale | Mundoolun | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 17/100 | 10/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 54.2 km | 59.8 km +10% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 49 min | 55 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 4285 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 84 postcode 4285 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (81.6%).
Setting
| Cedar Vale | Mundoolun | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 76 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 103 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 33.5 km | 30.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Cedar Vale | Mundoolun | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 60/100 | 55/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 32% 935 premises | 28% 610 premises |
Climate
| Cedar Vale | Mundoolun | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,682 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Cedar Vale | Mundoolun | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 13.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.27 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Cedar Vale | Mundoolun | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,681/yr same for both | |
| Council | Logan same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Cedar Vale | Mundoolun | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wright same for both | |
| Member | Scott Buchholz same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cedar Vale | Mundoolun | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cedar Vale
Other comparisons with Mundoolun
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.