Cedar Point vs Geneva
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Geneva, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Geneva tends to suit older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Geneva
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 31/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Geneva
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($290/wk vs $320/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Cedar Point
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (494 min vs 504 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (735.2 km vs 743.9 km)
- But Geneva is more walkable (30/100 vs 10/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Geneva
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (30/100 vs 10/100)
- carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 31/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (33% vs 21%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cedar Point and Geneva drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Geneva has more residents (699 vs 175); Cedar Point has higher household incomes ($73,320 vs $60,216).
| Cedar Point | Geneva | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 175 | 699 +299% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.9% | -2.0% |
| Median age | 50 same for both | |
| Median household income | $73,320/yr +18% vs other | $60,216/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $320/wk +9% vs other | $290/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.3%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cedar Point | Geneva | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $560,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Cedar Point has more rural and farming land (99% vs 87%).
| Cedar Point | Geneva | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 99% | 87% |
| Residential | 0% | 12% |
| Environmental | 1% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Cedar Point | Geneva | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 25 across Kyogle same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +0% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Cedar Point | Geneva | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 20% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 40% of NSW | Higher than 22% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 56% of NSW | Higher than 75% of NSW |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 67% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 11% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 52% of NSW | Higher than 72% of NSW |
Liveability
Geneva is more walkable (30 vs 10).
| Cedar Point | Geneva | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | C |
| Score | — | 47/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Cedar Point carries more crime risk (31 vs 12).
| Cedar Point | Geneva | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 31/100 | Low 12/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Cedar Point | Geneva | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Cedar Point | Geneva | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 3 | 2 |
Mobility
Geneva sits further from the CBD (743.9 km vs 735.2 km).
| Cedar Point | Geneva | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 | 30/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 735.2 km | 743.9 km +1% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 494 min | 504 min |
| Public transport score | 20/100 Bus | 29/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 2.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 8.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 3 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 2474 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 71 postcode 2474 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.0%).
Setting
| Cedar Point | Geneva | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 48 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 99 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Cedar Point | Geneva | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 63/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 82 premises | 38% 328 premises |
Council rates
| Cedar Point | Geneva | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,264/yr same for both | |
| Council | Kyogle same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Cedar Point | Geneva | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Page same for both | |
| Member | Kevin Hogan same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cedar Point | Geneva | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Geneva
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cedar Point
Other comparisons with Geneva
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.