Cedar Pocket vs Wolvi
Wolvi is the younger of the two, with a median age of 48 against 53 in Cedar Pocket. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Wolvi: a median of $1.19 million, against $1.05 million in Cedar Pocket, though rent is higher in Cedar Pocket.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Wolvi
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Cedar Pocket
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,050,000 vs $1,185,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Wolvi
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($270/wk vs $338/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Cedar Pocket sits closer to the CBD (178.6 km vs 182.4 km)
- Wolvi is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Wolvi
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Wolvi
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (11.6% vs -2.1%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cedar Pocket and Wolvi drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Wolvi has more residents (521 vs 332); Cedar Pocket rents higher ($338/wk vs $270/wk).
| Cedar Pocket | Wolvi | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 332 | 521 +57% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -2.1% | +11.6% |
| Median age | 53 | 48 |
| Median household income | $76,336/yr +10% vs other | $68,432/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $338/wk +20% vs other | $270/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cedar Pocket | Wolvi | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,050,000 | $1,185,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $787,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 2 days from 3 sales | — |
Development activity
| Cedar Pocket | Wolvi | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 467 across Gympie same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +16% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Cedar Pocket | Wolvi | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 47% of QLD | Higher than 35% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 27% of QLD | Higher than 76% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 43% of QLD | Higher than 45% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 55% of QLD | Higher than 41% of QLD |
Liveability
Wolvi is more walkable (13 vs 0).
| Cedar Pocket | Wolvi | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | C |
| Score | — | 49/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
| Cedar Pocket | Wolvi | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 33/100 | Low 38/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Cedar Pocket | Wolvi | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Cedar Pocket
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Wolvi
- Wolvi State School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Cedar Pocket | Wolvi | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 3 | 5 |
Mobility
Wolvi sits further from the CBD (182.4 km vs 178.6 km).
| Cedar Pocket | Wolvi | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 13/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 178.6 km | 182.4 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 127 min | 131 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 4570 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 83 postcode 4570 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.0%).
Setting
| Cedar Pocket | Wolvi | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 127 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 104 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 28.5 km | 26.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Cedar Pocket | Wolvi | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 148 premises | 0% 216 premises |
Climate
| Cedar Pocket | Wolvi | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,045 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.7°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Cedar Pocket | Wolvi | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,936/yr same for both | |
| Council | Gympie same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Cedar Pocket | Wolvi | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wide Bay same for both | |
| Member | Llew O'Brien same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cedar Pocket | Wolvi | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cedar Pocket
Other comparisons with Wolvi
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.