Cedar Pocket vs Neusa Vale
Cedar Pocket is the younger of the two, with a median age of 53 against 58 in Neusa Vale. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Cedar Pocket, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Neusa Vale tends to suit people living alone and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 6 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Cedar Pocket
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (22% vs 48%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Neusa Vale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($260/wk vs $338/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Cedar Pocket has a shorter drive in (127 min vs 133 min)
- Neusa Vale sits closer to the CBD (160.1 km vs 178.6 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Neusa Vale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (48% vs 24%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Neusa Vale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (3.8% vs -2.1%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cedar Pocket and Neusa Vale drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Cedar Pocket has more residents (332 vs 54); Cedar Pocket rents higher ($338/wk vs $260/wk).
| Cedar Pocket | Neusa Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 332 +84% vs other | 54 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -2.1% | +3.8% |
| Median age | 53 | 58 |
| Median household income | $76,336/yr +21% vs other | $60,112/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $338/wk +23% vs other | $260/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (35.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.4%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cedar Pocket | Neusa Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,050,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 2 days from 3 sales | — |
Development activity
| Cedar Pocket | Neusa Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 467 across Gympie same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +16% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Cedar Pocket | Neusa Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 47% of QLD | Higher than 25% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 27% of QLD | Higher than 21% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 43% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 55% of QLD | Higher than 54% of QLD |
Liveability
| Cedar Pocket | Neusa Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
| Cedar Pocket | Neusa Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 33/100 | Low 36/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Cedar Pocket | Neusa Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Cedar Pocket | Neusa Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 3 | 1 |
Mobility
Cedar Pocket sits further from the CBD (178.6 km vs 160.1 km).
| Cedar Pocket | Neusa Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 178.6 km +10% vs other | 160.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 127 min | 133 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 4570 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 83 postcode 4570 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.0%).
Setting
| Cedar Pocket | Neusa Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 127 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 104 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 28.5 km | 23.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Cedar Pocket | Neusa Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 148 premises | 0% 24 premises |
Climate
| Cedar Pocket | Neusa Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,045 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.7°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Cedar Pocket | Neusa Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,936/yr same for both | |
| Council | Gympie same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Cedar Pocket | Neusa Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wide Bay same for both | |
| Member | Llew O'Brien same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cedar Pocket | Neusa Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cedar Pocket
Other comparisons with Neusa Vale
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.