Cedar Pocket vs Kin Kin
Kin Kin is the younger of the two, with a median age of 49 against 53 in Cedar Pocket. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Cedar Pocket, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Kin Kin: a median of $1.18 million, against $1.05 million in Cedar Pocket, though rent is higher in Cedar Pocket. On these figures, Cedar Pocket tends to suit couples, while Kin Kin suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Cedar Pocket is already more of a family suburb (66% vs 54%)
- Kin Kin has more parks and reserves (6 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Cedar Pocket
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (22% vs 29%)
- has cheaper houses ($1,050,000 vs $1,175,004)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Kin Kin
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($300/wk vs $338/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Kin Kin
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (151.2 km vs 178.6 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Kin Kin
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Kin Kin
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (10.5% vs -2.1%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cedar Pocket and Kin Kin drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Kin Kin has more residents (844 vs 332); Cedar Pocket has higher household incomes ($76,336 vs $65,208).
| Cedar Pocket | Kin Kin | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 332 | 844 +154% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -2.1% | +10.5% |
| Median age | 53 | 49 |
| Median household income | $76,336/yr +15% vs other | $65,208/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $338/wk +11% vs other | $300/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.5%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cedar Pocket | Kin Kin | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,050,000 | $1,175,004 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $1,160,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 2 days from 3 sales | 39 days from 5 sales |
Development activity
| Cedar Pocket | Kin Kin | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 467 across Gympie | 239 across Noosa |
| Approvals change year on year | +16% | -9% |
Ranking within QLD
| Cedar Pocket | Kin Kin | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 47% of QLD | Higher than 30% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 27% of QLD | Higher than 75% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 43% of QLD | Higher than 63% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 55% of QLD | Higher than 47% of QLD |
Liveability
Kin Kin is more walkable (13 vs 0).
| Cedar Pocket | Kin Kin | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 52/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
| Cedar Pocket | Kin Kin | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 33/100 | Moderate 42/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Cedar Pocket | Kin Kin | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Cedar Pocket
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Kin Kin
- Kin Kin State School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Cedar Pocket | Kin Kin | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 6 |
| Waterways | 3 | 16 |
Mobility
Cedar Pocket sits further from the CBD (178.6 km vs 151.2 km).
| Cedar Pocket | Kin Kin | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 13/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 178.6 km +15% vs other | 151.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 127 min | 123 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 4570 | 0.4% postcode 4571 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 83 postcode 4570 | 75 postcode 4571 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.0%).
Setting
| Cedar Pocket | Kin Kin | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 127 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 82 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 28.5 km | 19.9 km |
NBN connectivity
| Cedar Pocket | Kin Kin | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 148 premises | 0% 415 premises |
Climate
| Cedar Pocket | Kin Kin | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,045 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.7°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Cedar Pocket | Kin Kin | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,936/yr | $1,614/yr |
| Council | Gympie | Noosa |
Federal electorate
| Cedar Pocket | Kin Kin | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wide Bay same for both | |
| Member | Llew O'Brien same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cedar Pocket | Kin Kin | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cedar Pocket
Other comparisons with Kin Kin
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.