Cedar Party vs Killabakh
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. Houses cost more in Cedar Party: a median of $845,000, against $751,000 in Killabakh, and rent is higher there too.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Killabakh
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (21/100 vs 31/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Killabakh
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($751,379 vs $845,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Killabakh
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($245/wk vs $295/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Cedar Party
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (329.4 km vs 339.6 km)
- has a shorter drive in (240 min vs 246 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Killabakh
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (21/100 vs 31/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Cedar Party
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (4.1% vs -9.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cedar Party and Killabakh drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Cedar Party has more residents (379 vs 248); Cedar Party has higher household incomes ($61,516 vs $51,064).
| Cedar Party | Killabakh | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 379 +35% vs other | 248 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.1% | -9.5% |
| Median age | 57 same for both | |
| Median household income | $61,516/yr +17% vs other | $51,064/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $295/wk +17% vs other | $245/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.0%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cedar Party | Killabakh | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $845,000 | $751,379 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Cedar Party has more rural and farming land (100% vs 68%); Killabakh has more land zoned for conservation (32% vs 0%).
| Cedar Party | Killabakh | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 100% | 68% |
| Environmental | 0% | 32% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Cedar Party | Killabakh | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 743 across Mid-Coast same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +327% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Cedar Party | Killabakh | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 39% of NSW | Higher than 77% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 23% of NSW | Higher than 12% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 54% of NSW | Higher than 46% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 40% of NSW | Higher than 5% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 25% of NSW | Higher than 24% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 61% of NSW | Higher than 40% of NSW |
Liveability
| Cedar Party | Killabakh | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Cedar Party carries more crime risk (31 vs 21).
| Cedar Party | Killabakh | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 51/100 | Moderate 58/100 |
| Crime | Low 31/100 | Low 21/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Cedar Party | Killabakh | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Cedar Party | Killabakh | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 2 | 10 |
Mobility
Killabakh sits further from the CBD (339.6 km vs 329.4 km).
| Cedar Party | Killabakh | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 8/100 | 5/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 329.4 km | 339.6 km +3% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 240 min | 246 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 2429 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 62 postcode 2429 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (72.9%).
Setting
| Cedar Party | Killabakh | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 24 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 109 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 24.5 km | 29.9 km |
NBN connectivity
| Cedar Party | Killabakh | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 165 premises | 0% 104 premises |
Climate
| Cedar Party | Killabakh | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,331 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Cedar Party | Killabakh | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,560/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mid-Coast same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Cedar Party | Killabakh | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Lyne same for both | |
| Member | Alison Penfold same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cedar Party | Killabakh | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cedar Party
Other comparisons with Killabakh
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.