Cedar Creek vs Samford Valley
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and the large majority of households are couple families. Samford Valley is closer to the city centre: 25.7 km, against 32.4 km.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Samford Valley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more parks and reserves (16 vs 3)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Cedar Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($600/wk vs $660/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Samford Valley
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (18/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (25.7 km vs 32.4 km)
- has a shorter drive in (38 min vs 44 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Samford Valley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (18/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Cedar Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (11.5% vs 4.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cedar Creek and Samford Valley drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Samford Valley has more residents (3,208 vs 831); Samford Valley rents higher ($660/wk vs $600/wk).
| Cedar Creek | Samford Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 831 | 3,208 +286% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +11.5% | +4.6% |
| Median age | 43 | 45 |
| Median household income | $169,000/yr same for both | |
| Median weekly rent | $600/wk | $660/wk +10% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cedar Creek | Samford Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,900,000 same for both | |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $1,210,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 163 days from 4 sales | 31 days from 39 sales |
Development activity
| Cedar Creek | Samford Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 6,996 across Moreton Bay same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +49% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Cedar Creek | Samford Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 98% of QLD same for both | |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 29% of QLD | Higher than 78% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 96% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 36% of QLD | Higher than 89% of QLD |
Liveability
Samford Valley is more walkable (18 vs 0); Samford Valley scores higher overall (84 vs 68).
| Cedar Creek | Samford Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | A+ |
| Score | 68/100 | 84/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Cedar Creek carries more bushfire risk (41 vs 0).
| Cedar Creek | Samford Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 41/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Low 14/100 | Low 17/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Cedar Creek | Samford Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Cedar Creek | Samford Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 16 |
| Waterways | 1 | 5 |
Mobility
Cedar Creek sits further from the CBD (32.4 km vs 25.7 km).
| Cedar Creek | Samford Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 18/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 32.4 km +21% vs other | 25.7 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 44 min | 38 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.4% postcode 4520 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (57.7%).
Setting
| Cedar Creek | Samford Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 118 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 73 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 21.4 km | 18.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Cedar Creek | Samford Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 27/100 | 77/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 194 premises | 50% 1,117 premises |
Climate
| Cedar Creek | Samford Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | — | 1,032 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 30.5°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 8.9°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Cedar Creek | Samford Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 13.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.74 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Cedar Creek | Samford Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,577/yr same for both | |
| Council | Moreton Bay same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Cedar Creek | Samford Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Dickson same for both | |
| Member | Ali France same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cedar Creek | Samford Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Cedar Creek
Samford Valley
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cedar Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.