Cedar Creek vs Tamborine Mountain
Cedar Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 43 against 50 in Tamborine Mountain. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Cedar Creek, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Cedar Creek: a median of $1.3 million, against $1.12 million in Tamborine Mountain. On these figures, Cedar Creek tends to suit couples, while Tamborine Mountain suits people living alone and older residents.
Cedar Creek is a much smaller, younger community of 861 people with significantly higher household incomes ($119,288 versus $78,416) and a stronger liveability score of 65. It's closer to Brisbane at 53.1 km and has notably lower crime and bushfire risk. Tamborine Mountain is larger with 8,105 residents and a median age of 50, offering better walkability at 34 compared to Cedar Creek's 23, though it sits further out at 74.1 km from the CBD. Both suburbs share the same socio-economic ranking and similar rental costs, but Cedar Creek suits buyers prioritising higher incomes and safety, while Tamborine Mountain appeals to those seeking a more established, walkable community.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Tamborine Mountain
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools inside the suburb (4 vs 0)
- has more childcare (5 vs 1)
- has more parks and reserves (31 vs 8)
- But Cedar Creek carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 31/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Cedar Creek leaves households under less mortgage stress (20% vs 28%)
- Tamborine Mountain has cheaper houses ($1,125,000 vs $1,300,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Cedar Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves renters under less rental stress (19% vs 28%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Cedar Creek
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (47 min vs 73 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (53.1 km vs 74.1 km)
- But Tamborine Mountain is more walkable (34/100 vs 23/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Tamborine Mountain
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more GPs (3 vs 0)
- has more residents already 65 and over (27% vs 15%)
- is more walkable (34/100 vs 23/100)
- But Cedar Creek carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 31/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Tamborine Mountain
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (8.0% vs 2.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cedar Creek and Tamborine Mountain drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Tamborine Mountain has more residents (8,105 vs 861); Cedar Creek has higher household incomes ($119,288 vs $78,416).
| Cedar Creek | Tamborine Mountain | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 861 | 8,105 +841% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.7% | +8.0% |
| Median age | 43 | 50 |
| Median household income | $119,288/yr +34% vs other | $78,416/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $433/wk +3% vs other | $420/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cedar Creek | Tamborine Mountain | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,300,000 | $1,125,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $710,000 |
| Median land price | — | $915,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 48 days from 126 sales |
Development activity
| Cedar Creek | Tamborine Mountain | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 7,196 across Gold Coast | 524 across Scenic Rim |
| Approvals change year on year | -35% | +65% |
Gross rental yield
| Cedar Creek | Tamborine Mountain | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.4% $870/wk on $1.35M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Cedar Creek | Tamborine Mountain | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 89% of QLD | Higher than 49% of QLD |
| Schools | — | Higher than 59% of QLD |
| Walkability | Higher than 80% of QLD | Higher than 83% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 76% of QLD | Higher than 92% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 38% of QLD | Higher than 93% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 19% of QLD |
Liveability
Tamborine Mountain is more walkable (34 vs 23); Cedar Creek scores higher overall (66 vs 56).
| Cedar Creek | Tamborine Mountain | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 66/100 | 56/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Tamborine Mountain carries more crime risk (31 vs 13).
| Cedar Creek | Tamborine Mountain | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 41/100 | Moderate 50/100 |
| Crime | Low 13/100 | Low 31/100 |
| Flood | — | Not mapped no mapped data here |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Cedar Creek | Tamborine Mountain | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 4 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 3 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Cedar Creek
- Cedar Creek State School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Tamborine Mountain
- Tamborine Mountain State High School Government · Secondary above peers
- St Bernard State School Government · Primary at peers
- Tamborine Mountain College Independent · Combined at peers
- Tamborine Mountain State School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Cedar Creek | Tamborine Mountain | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 39 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 31 |
| Childcare | 1 | 5 |
| GPs | 0 | 3 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 27 | 45 |
Mobility
Tamborine Mountain sits further from the CBD (74.1 km vs 53.1 km).
| Cedar Creek | Tamborine Mountain | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 23/100 | 34/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 53.1 km | 74.1 km +40% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 47 min | 73 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 4207 | 1.7% postcode 4272 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 70 postcode 4207 | 64 postcode 4272 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.3%).
Setting
| Cedar Creek | Tamborine Mountain | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 53 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 541 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 18.1 km | 20.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Cedar Creek | Tamborine Mountain | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 28/100 | 83/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 254 premises | 57% 3,887 premises |
Climate
| Cedar Creek | Tamborine Mountain | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,682 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Cedar Creek | Tamborine Mountain | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ | 5.4 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 14.5 µg/m³ | 19.3 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.42 pphm | 0.91 pphm |
Council rates
| Cedar Creek | Tamborine Mountain | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,298/yr | $1,689/yr |
| Council | Gold Coast | Scenic Rim |
Federal electorate
| Cedar Creek | Tamborine Mountain | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Forde | Wright |
| Member | Rowan Holzberger | Scott Buchholz |
| Party | Australian Labor Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cedar Creek | Tamborine Mountain | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cedar Creek
Other comparisons with Tamborine Mountain
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.