Cedar Creek vs Logan Village
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Logan Village is closer to the city centre: 44.1 km, against 53.1 km.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Cedar Creek carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 76/100)
- Logan Village has more childcare (4 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Cedar Creek is more walkable (23/100 vs 10/100)
- Logan Village sits closer to the CBD (44.1 km vs 53.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Cedar Creek
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 76/100)
- is more walkable (23/100 vs 10/100)
- But Logan Village has more GPs (2 vs 0)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Logan Village
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (20.4% vs 2.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cedar Creek and Logan Village drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Logan Village has more residents (5,316 vs 861); Cedar Creek has higher household incomes ($119,288 vs $106,548).
| Cedar Creek | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 861 | 5,316 +517% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.7% | +20.4% |
| Median age | 43 | 42 |
| Median household income | $119,288/yr +11% vs other | $106,548/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $433/wk | $455/wk +5% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cedar Creek | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,300,000 | $1,200,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $995,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 37 days from 40 sales |
Development activity
| Cedar Creek | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 7,196 across Gold Coast | 4,950 across Logan |
| Approvals change year on year | -35% | -8% |
Gross rental yield
| Cedar Creek | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 2.7% $672/wk on $1.3M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Cedar Creek | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 89% of QLD | — |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 80% of QLD | Higher than 72% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 76% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 38% of QLD | Higher than 77% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 7% of QLD |
Liveability
Cedar Creek is more walkable (23 vs 10); Cedar Creek scores higher overall (66 vs 35).
| Cedar Creek | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 66/100 | 35/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Logan Village carries more crime risk (76 vs 13).
| Cedar Creek | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 41/100 | Moderate 50/100 |
| Crime | Low 13/100 | High 76/100 |
| Flood | — | Not mapped no mapped data here |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Cedar Creek | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Cedar Creek
- Cedar Creek State School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Logan Village
- Logan Village State School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Cedar Creek | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 6 |
| Childcare | 1 | 4 |
| GPs | 0 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 3 |
| Waterways | 27 | 14 |
Mobility
Cedar Creek sits further from the CBD (53.1 km vs 44.1 km).
| Cedar Creek | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 23/100 | 10/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 53.1 km +17% vs other | 44.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 47 min same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 4207 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 70 postcode 4207 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.3%).
Setting
| Cedar Creek | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 53 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 31 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 18.1 km | 19.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Cedar Creek | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 28/100 | 67/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 254 premises | 42% 2,122 premises |
Climate
| Cedar Creek | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,682 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Cedar Creek | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ | 4.9 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 14.5 µg/m³ | 13.1 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.42 pphm | 0.27 pphm |
Council rates
| Cedar Creek | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,298/yr | $1,681/yr |
| Council | Gold Coast | Logan |
Federal electorate
| Cedar Creek | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Forde | Wright |
| Member | Rowan Holzberger | Scott Buchholz |
| Party | Australian Labor Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cedar Creek | Logan Village | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cedar Creek
Other comparisons with Logan Village
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.