Cecil Park vs Mount Vernon
Mount Vernon is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 43 in Cecil Park. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Vernon
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (28/100 vs 70/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Cecil Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($400/wk vs $495/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Cecil Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (26/100 vs 14/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Cecil Park
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (26/100 vs 14/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (21% vs 16%)
- But Mount Vernon carries lower crime risk (28/100 vs 70/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cecil Park and Mount Vernon drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Vernon has more residents (1,235 vs 815); Mount Vernon has higher household incomes ($165,204 vs $127,192).
| Cecil Park | Mount Vernon | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 815 | 1,235 +52% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.7% | +3.6% |
| Median age | 43 | 40 |
| Median household income | $127,192/yr | $165,204/yr +30% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $400/wk | $495/wk +24% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cecil Park | Mount Vernon | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $3,475,000 | $3,607,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Development activity
| Cecil Park | Mount Vernon | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,229 across Liverpool | 1,063 across Penrith |
| Approvals change year on year | +28% | -78% |
Ranking within NSW
| Cecil Park | Mount Vernon | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 97% of NSW | Higher than 95% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 88% of NSW | Higher than 97% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 73% of NSW | Higher than 65% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 5% of NSW | Higher than 15% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 63% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 69% of NSW | Higher than 70% of NSW |
Liveability
Cecil Park is more walkable (26 vs 14); Mount Vernon scores higher overall (69 vs 44).
| Cecil Park | Mount Vernon | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 44/100 | 69/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Cecil Park carries more bushfire risk (51 vs 0); Cecil Park carries more crime risk (70 vs 28).
| Cecil Park | Mount Vernon | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 51/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | High 70/100 | Low 28/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | High 70/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 6 within 5 km |
Schools
| Cecil Park | Mount Vernon | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 50 Scott Street Liverpool, 9.5 km | None |
Schools in Cecil Park
- Irfan College Independent · Combined at peers
Schools in Mount Vernon
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Cecil Park | Mount Vernon | |
|---|---|---|
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 9 | 0 |
Mobility
| Cecil Park | Mount Vernon | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 26/100 | 14/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 48.7 km +3% vs other | 47.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 49 min | 46 min |
| Public transport score | 29/100 Bus | 30/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 7.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 7.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 2 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2178 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 54 postcode 2178 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (58.1%).
Setting
| Cecil Park | Mount Vernon | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 93 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 82 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 31.2 km | 33.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Cecil Park | Mount Vernon | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 18% 273 premises | 28% 369 premises |
Climate
| Cecil Park | Mount Vernon | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 931 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Cecil Park | Mount Vernon | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.7 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 16.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.37 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Cecil Park | Mount Vernon | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,322/yr | $1,547/yr |
| Council | Liverpool | Penrith |
Federal electorate
| Cecil Park | Mount Vernon | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Werriwa | Mcmahon |
| Member | Anne Maree Stanley | Chris Bowen |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cecil Park | Mount Vernon | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Cecil Park
Mount Vernon
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cecil Park
Other comparisons with Mount Vernon
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.