Cecil Hills vs Edensor Park
In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Edensor Park is closer to the city centre: 38.5 km, against 49.4 km.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Cecil Hills
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more parks and reserves (13 vs 6)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Cecil Hills
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (21% vs 28%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Edensor Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (27% vs 15%)
- has cheaper rent ($450/wk vs $550/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Edensor Park
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (38.5 km vs 49.4 km)
- is more walkable (80/100 vs 68/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Edensor Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (80/100 vs 68/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Edensor Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (5.2% vs -1.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cecil Hills and Edensor Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Edensor Park has more residents (10,279 vs 6,906); Cecil Hills has higher household incomes ($125,268 vs $94,484).
| Cecil Hills | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,906 | 10,279 +49% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -1.6% | +5.2% |
| Median age | 38 | 39 |
| Median household income | $125,268/yr +25% vs other | $94,484/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $550/wk +18% vs other | $450/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cecil Hills | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,480,000 | $1,450,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $800,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 26 sales | 28 days from 31 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
31 vs 13 sales
10 vs 22 sales
Development activity
| Cecil Hills | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,229 across Liverpool | 1,095 across Fairfield |
| Approvals change year on year | +28% | +29% |
Gross rental yield
| Cecil Hills | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.3% $1,000/wk on $1.2M | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Cecil Hills | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 73% of NSW same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 87% of NSW | Higher than 62% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 88% of NSW | Higher than 92% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 53% of NSW | Higher than 31% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 81% of NSW | Higher than 63% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 85% of NSW | Higher than 82% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 87% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Edensor Park is more walkable (80 vs 68); Edensor Park scores higher overall (65 vs 56).
| Cecil Hills | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 56/100 | 65/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Cecil Hills carries more bushfire risk (56 vs 0).
| Cecil Hills | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 56/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Low 36/100 | Low 31/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 5 within 5 km |
Schools
| Cecil Hills | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 50 Scott Street Liverpool, 8.0 km | 1 50 Scott Street Liverpool, 6.0 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 4.5% | 3.2% |
Schools in Cecil Hills
- Cecil Hills High School Government · Secondary above peers
- Cecil Hills Public School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Edensor Park
- Edensor Park Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Governor Philip King Public School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Cecil Hills | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 same for both | |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 13 | 6 |
| Childcare | 5 | 7 |
| GPs | 1 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 1 same for both | |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 14 | 15 |
Mobility
Cecil Hills sits further from the CBD (49.4 km vs 38.5 km).
| Cecil Hills | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 68/100 | 80/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 49.4 km +22% vs other | 38.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 47 min | 43 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 91.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 250.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.1% postcode 2171 | 0.6% postcode 2176 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 57 postcode 2171 | 44 postcode 2176 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (58.4%).
Setting
| Cecil Hills | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 74 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 54 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 29.6 km | 27.1 km |
NBN connectivity
| Cecil Hills | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 76/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Hybrid fibre-coaxial |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 56% 2,064 premises | 0% 3,056 premises |
Climate
| Cecil Hills | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 931 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Cecil Hills | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.72 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Cecil Hills | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,322/yr | $990/yr |
| Council | Liverpool | Fairfield |
Federal electorate
| Cecil Hills | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Werriwa | Fowler |
| Member | Anne Maree Stanley | Dai Le |
| Party | Australian Labor Party | Independent |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cecil Hills | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Cecil Hills
Edensor Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cecil Hills
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.