Caveat vs Terip Terip
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are people living alone. On these figures, Caveat tends to suit people living alone, while Terip Terip suits older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Caveat
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (4 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (35/100 vs 76/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, and childcare.
First-home buyers
Caveat
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (22% vs 28%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Caveat
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($50/wk vs $250/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (4% vs 14%)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Caveat
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (154.7 km vs 177 km)
- has a shorter drive in (127 min vs 137 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Caveat
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (35/100 vs 76/100)
- But Terip Terip has more residents already 65 and over (32% vs 17%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Caveat
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (43.9% vs 26.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Caveat and Terip Terip drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Terip Terip rents higher ($250/wk vs $50/wk); Terip Terip has higher household incomes ($94,224 vs $71,500).
| Caveat | Terip Terip | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 59 | 72 +22% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +43.9% | +26.3% |
| Median age | 58 same for both | |
| Median household income | $71,500/yr | $94,224/yr +32% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $50/wk | $250/wk +400% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (30.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.1%).
Zoning mix
| Caveat | Terip Terip | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 95% | 98% |
| Parks and recreation | 5% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Caveat | Terip Terip | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 82 across Murrindindi same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +83% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Caveat | Terip Terip | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 36% of VIC | Higher than 64% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 71% of VIC | Higher than 21% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 17% of VIC | Higher than 58% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 7% of VIC | Higher than 12% of VIC |
Liveability
Caveat is more walkable (10 vs 0).
| Caveat | Terip Terip | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Caveat carries more bushfire risk (28 vs 0); Terip Terip carries more crime risk (76 vs 35).
| Caveat | Terip Terip | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 28/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Low 35/100 | High 76/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Caveat | Terip Terip | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Caveat | Terip Terip | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 0 |
| Waterways | 9 | 10 |
Mobility
Terip Terip sits further from the CBD (177 km vs 154.7 km).
| Caveat | Terip Terip | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 154.7 km | 177 km +14% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 127 min | 137 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 3660 | 0.6% postcode 3719 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 46 postcode 3660 | 62 postcode 3719 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.3%).
Setting
| Caveat | Terip Terip | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 562 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 534 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Caveat | Terip Terip | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 | 16/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 27 premises | 0% 22 premises |
Climate
| Caveat | Terip Terip | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 648 mm | 865 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 27.2°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 2.0°C |
Council rates
| Caveat | Terip Terip | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,973/yr same for both | |
| Council | Murrindindi same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Caveat | Terip Terip | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Indi same for both | |
| Member | Helen Haines same for both | |
| Party | Independent same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Caveat | Terip Terip | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Caveat
Other comparisons with Terip Terip
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.