Catherine Field vs Gledswood Hills
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Gledswood Hills tends to suit families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Gledswood Hills
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (7 vs 2)
- has more schools inside the suburb (2 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (9 vs 3)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Gledswood Hills
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper land ($1,115,000 vs $4,050,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Gledswood Hills
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (51/100 vs 34/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Gledswood Hills
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (2 vs 0)
- is more walkable (51/100 vs 34/100)
- But Catherine Field has more residents already 65 and over (12% vs 4%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield.
Where they sit
Catherine Field and Gledswood Hills drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Gledswood Hills has more residents (6,112 vs 2,609); Gledswood Hills has higher household incomes ($144,560 vs $120,432).
| Catherine Field | Gledswood Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,609 | 6,112 +134% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +57.5% | — |
| Median age | 33 | 31 |
| Median household income | $120,432/yr | $144,560/yr +20% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $520/wk | $540/wk +4% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Catherine Field | Gledswood Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,260,000 | $1,360,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $4,050,000 | $1,115,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 35 days from 67 sales | 28 days from 112 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
14 vs 14 sales
57 vs 105 sales
28 vs 40 sales
Zoning mix
Catherine Field has more rural and farming land (72% vs 4%).
| Catherine Field | Gledswood Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 72% | 4% |
| Residential | 23% | 43% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 32% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 9% |
| Commercial | 0% | 6% |
| Environmental | 3% | 5% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Catherine Field | Gledswood Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,671 across Camden same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -21% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Catherine Field | Gledswood Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.3% $785/wk on $1.22M | 3.3% $880/wk on $1.38M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Catherine Field | Gledswood Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 60% of NSW | Higher than 67% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 84% of NSW | Higher than 94% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 77% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 68% of NSW | Higher than 73% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 91% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 98% of NSW | Higher than 97% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 36% of NSW | Higher than 35% of NSW |
Liveability
Gledswood Hills is more walkable (51 vs 34); Gledswood Hills scores higher overall (67 vs 59).
| Catherine Field | Gledswood Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 59/100 | 67/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
| Catherine Field | Gledswood Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 16/100 | Low 19/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 45/100 | Moderate 54/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Catherine Field | Gledswood Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Western Sydney University - Campbelltown, 9.4 km | 1 Western Sydney University - Campbelltown, 6.7 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 1.7% same for both | |
Schools in Catherine Field
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Gledswood Hills
- Gledswood Hills Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Gledswood Hills High School Government · Secondary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Catherine Field | Gledswood Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 9 |
| Childcare | 2 | 7 |
| GPs | 0 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 6 |
Mobility
| Catherine Field | Gledswood Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 34/100 | 51/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 56.1 km | 56.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 53 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 52.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 102.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.7% postcode 2557 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 69 postcode 2557 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (57.7%).
Setting
| Catherine Field | Gledswood Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 95 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 112 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 33.3 km | 30.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Catherine Field | Gledswood Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 99/100 | 98/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 93% 1,677 premises | 94% 987 premises |
Climate
| Catherine Field | Gledswood Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 817 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 4.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Catherine Field | Gledswood Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.7 µg/m³ | 5.8 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 16.9 µg/m³ | 14.8 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.37 pphm | 0.97 pphm |
Council rates
| Catherine Field | Gledswood Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,504/yr same for both | |
| Council | Camden same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Catherine Field | Gledswood Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hume | Macarthur |
| Member | Angus Taylor | Mike Freelander |
| Party | Liberal | Australian Labor Party |
First Home Owner Grant
| Catherine Field | Gledswood Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Gledswood Hills
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Catherine Field
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.