Casey vs Nicholls
Casey is the younger of the two, with a median age of 32 against 44 in Nicholls. In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Nicholls: a median of $1.23 million, against $915,000 in Casey. On these figures, Casey tends to suit families with children and buyers on a tighter budget.
Casey and Nicholls are both outer Canberra suburbs roughly equidistant from the CBD, but they differ significantly on safety and liveability. Casey scores 66 on the liveability index compared to Nicholls' 55, and has a much lower crime risk rating of 22 versus 42. Most notably, Nicholls carries a bushfire risk of 86 while Casey has none, making it a key consideration if natural hazard exposure matters to you. Casey also offers a slightly higher rental yield at 4.6% for houses. Nicholls may appeal to those prioritising affordability, but Casey presents a stronger overall safety and liveability profile.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Nicholls
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 0)
- has more childcare (8 vs 2)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (89% vs 76%)
- But Casey carries lower crime risk (23/100 vs 43/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Casey
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper units ($472,500 vs $800,000)
- has cheaper houses ($915,000 vs $1,227,500)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Casey
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (30% vs 15%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Casey
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (23 min vs 30 min)
- is more walkable (64/100 vs 50/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Casey
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (24% vs 11%)
- carries lower crime risk (23/100 vs 43/100)
- is more walkable (64/100 vs 50/100)
- But Nicholls has more residents already 65 and over (17% vs 5%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Casey
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (12.4% vs -2.7%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Casey and Nicholls drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Nicholls skews older (44 vs 32); Nicholls has higher household incomes ($162,968 vs $139,360).
| Casey | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,471 | 6,680 +3% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +12.4% | -2.7% |
| Median age | 32 | 44 |
| Median household income | $139,360/yr | $162,968/yr +17% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $502/wk same for both | |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Casey | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $915,000 | $1,227,500 |
| Median unit price | $472,500 | $800,000 |
| Median land price | $1,152,500 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 21 days from 53 sales | 22 days from 86 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
53 vs 24 sales
40 vs 62 sales
7 vs 27 sales
Development activity
| Casey | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,750 across Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Casey | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.5% $680/wk on $785K | 4.5% $750/wk on $875K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within ACT
| Casey | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 76% of ACT | Higher than 89% of ACT |
| Schools | — | Higher than 100% of ACT |
| Walkability | Higher than 53% of ACT | Higher than 34% of ACT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 37% of ACT same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 81% of ACT | Higher than 90% of ACT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 70% of ACT | Higher than 66% of ACT |
Liveability
Casey is more walkable (64 vs 50).
| Casey | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 56/100 | 52/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Nicholls carries more flood risk (55 vs 0); Nicholls carries more crime risk (43 vs 23).
| Casey | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 93/100 | High 88/100 |
| Crime | Low 23/100 | Moderate 43/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 | Moderate 55/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Casey | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 UC - Canberra, Bruce, 8.7 km | 2 UC - Canberra, Bruce, 6.5 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.0% | 3.5% |
Schools in Casey
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Nicholls
- Holy Spirit Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- St John Paul II College Catholic · Secondary above peers
- Gold Creek School Government · Combined
Amenities in the suburb
| Casey | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 same for both | |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 2 |
| Childcare | 2 | 8 |
| GPs | 2 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 2 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 2 |
| Waterways | 0 | 2 |
Mobility
| Casey | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 64/100 | 50/100 |
| Distance to Canberra | 16 km +4% vs other | 15.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 23 min | 30 min |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 43.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 99.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.7% postcode 2913 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 47 postcode 2913 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.7%).
Setting
| Casey | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 657 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 627 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Casey | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 93/100 | 100/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 87% 2,533 premises | 100% 2,517 premises |
Climate
| Casey | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 622 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 0.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Casey | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 11.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.41 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Casey | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,105/yr same for both | |
| Council | Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Casey | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fenner same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Leigh same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Casey | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | Not offered same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | None same for both | |
Tags
Nicholls
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Casey
Other comparisons with Nicholls
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.