Carneys Creek vs Emu Vale
Carneys Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 55 against 60 in Emu Vale. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Carneys Creek, the large majority of households are couple families. In Emu Vale, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Carneys Creek tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Carneys Creek
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 50/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (100% vs 46%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Emu Vale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (30% vs 48%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Carneys Creek has a bigger rental market to choose from (18% vs 4%)
- Emu Vale has cheaper rent ($200/wk vs $275/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Carneys Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (101 min vs 160 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (119.4 km vs 174.8 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Carneys Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 50/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Carneys Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (39.2% vs -13.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Carneys Creek and Emu Vale drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Emu Vale has more residents (161 vs 71); Carneys Creek rents higher ($275/wk vs $200/wk).
| Carneys Creek | Emu Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 71 | 161 +127% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +39.2% | -13.0% |
| Median age | 55 | 60 |
| Median household income | $58,500/yr +18% vs other | $48,256/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $275/wk +27% vs other | $200/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (27.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.1%).
Development activity
| Carneys Creek | Emu Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 524 across Scenic Rim | 291 across Southern Downs |
| Approvals change year on year | +65% | +63% |
Ranking within QLD
| Carneys Creek | Emu Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 23% of QLD | Higher than 11% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 48% of QLD | Higher than 57% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 51% of QLD | Higher than 56% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 23% of QLD | Higher than 40% of QLD |
Liveability
| Carneys Creek | Emu Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Emu Vale carries more crime risk (50 vs 12).
| Carneys Creek | Emu Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 79/100 | High 74/100 |
| Crime | Low 12/100 | Moderate 50/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Carneys Creek | Emu Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Carneys Creek | Emu Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 7 same for both | |
Mobility
Emu Vale sits further from the CBD (174.8 km vs 119.4 km).
| Carneys Creek | Emu Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 119.4 km | 174.8 km +46% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 101 min | 160 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 4310 | 0.4% postcode 4371 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 77 postcode 4310 | 78 postcode 4371 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (67.9%).
Setting
| Carneys Creek | Emu Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 377 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 596 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Carneys Creek | Emu Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 16/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 30 premises | 0% 91 premises |
Climate
| Carneys Creek | Emu Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 760 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Carneys Creek | Emu Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,689/yr | $1,627/yr |
| Council | Scenic Rim | Southern Downs |
Federal electorate
| Carneys Creek | Emu Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wright | Maranoa |
| Member | Scott Buchholz | David Littleproud |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Carneys Creek | Emu Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Carneys Creek
Other comparisons with Emu Vale
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.