Carnes Hill vs Hoxton Park
Carnes Hill is the younger of the two, with a median age of 32 against 35 in Hoxton Park. In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Carnes Hill: a median of $1.4 million, against $1.17 million in Hoxton Park, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Carnes Hill tends to suit families with children and couples, while Hoxton Park suits buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Hoxton Park
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (4 vs 1)
- has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 1)
- has more childcare (5 vs 2)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Hoxton Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper land ($650,000 vs $985,000)
- has cheaper houses ($1,170,000 vs $1,400,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Hoxton Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($490/wk vs $600/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Hoxton Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (43/100 vs 71/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Carnes Hill
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (63.1% vs 5.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Carnes Hill and Hoxton Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Hoxton Park has more residents (4,572 vs 3,332); Carnes Hill has higher household incomes ($136,760 vs $101,920).
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,332 | 4,572 +37% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +63.1% | +5.0% |
| Median age | 32 | 35 |
| Median household income | $136,760/yr +25% vs other | $101,920/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $600/wk +18% vs other | $490/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,400,000 | $1,170,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $985,000 | $650,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 12 sales | 25 days from 15 sales |
Zoning mix
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 63% same for both | |
| Parks and recreation | 18% | 9% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 9% | 17% |
| Commercial | 10% | 1% |
| Environmental | 0% | 6% |
| Industrial | 0% | 4% |
| Planning zones cover 99% of Carnes Hill and 100% of Hoxton Park. The rest is unzoned land such as water or road reserve. | ||
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,229 across Liverpool same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +28% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.7% $760/wk on $1.05M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 72% of NSW | Higher than 57% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 91% of NSW | Higher than 70% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 70% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 90% of NSW | Higher than 89% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 61% of NSW | Higher than 58% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 81% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 79% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 60% of NSW |
Liveability
Carnes Hill scores higher overall (69 vs 56).
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 69/100 | 56/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Hoxton Park carries more bushfire risk (42 vs 0); Carnes Hill carries more crime risk (71 vs 43).
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 42/100 |
| Crime | High 71/100 | Moderate 43/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 50 Scott Street Liverpool, 6.4 km | 1 50 Scott Street Liverpool, 5.5 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.8% | 3.2% |
Schools in Carnes Hill
- Holy Spirit Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
Schools in Hoxton Park
- Good Shepherd Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Hoxton Park Public School Government · Primary below peers
- Malek Fahd Islamic School Hoxton Park Independent · Combined
Amenities in the suburb
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 7 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 4 |
| Childcare | 2 | 5 |
| GPs | 2 same for both | |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 3 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 6 | 9 |
Mobility
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 75/100 | 71/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 46.9 km same for both | |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 44 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 70/100 Bus | 78/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 21.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 68.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 2 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.1% postcode 2171 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 57 postcode 2171 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (60.7%).
Setting
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 45 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 32 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 26.9 km | 26.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 72/100 | 74/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 49% 253 premises | 37% 1,360 premises |
Climate
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 909 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.7°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.4°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.72 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,322/yr same for both | |
| Council | Liverpool same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Werriwa same for both | |
| Member | Anne Maree Stanley same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Carnes Hill | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Carnes Hill
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Carnes Hill
Other comparisons with Hoxton Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.