Canterbury vs Earlwood
Canterbury is the younger of the two, with a median age of 34 against 44 in Earlwood. In Canterbury, about half of households rent and most homes are flats or apartments. In Earlwood, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Canterbury tends to suit renters, young adults, and people living alone, while Earlwood suits couples and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Earlwood
ahead on 6 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (11 vs 3)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (80% vs 29%)
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Canterbury
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($745,000 vs $881,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Canterbury
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (49% vs 21%)
- has cheaper rent ($470/wk vs $570/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Canterbury
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- gets more of its commuters onto trains and trams (10% vs 3%)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Earlwood
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (6 vs 2)
- has more residents already 65 and over (21% vs 11%)
- carries lower crime risk (33/100 vs 53/100)
- But Canterbury has more units and townhouses to downsize into (71% vs 20%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Canterbury
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is growing faster (30.4% vs 1.8%)
- returns a higher gross yield on units (5.2% vs 3.9%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Canterbury and Earlwood drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Earlwood has more residents (18,053 vs 9,430); Earlwood skews older (44 vs 34).
| Canterbury | Earlwood | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,430 | 18,053 +91% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +30.4% | +1.8% |
| Median age | 34 | 44 |
| Median household income | $97,864/yr | $112,528/yr +15% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $470/wk | $570/wk +21% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Canterbury | Earlwood | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,957,500 | $2,080,000 |
| Median unit price | $745,000 | $881,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 26 days from 30 sales | 24 days from 166 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
87 vs 29 sales
9 vs 6 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
10 vs 26 sales
19 vs 131 sales
17 vs 44 sales
Zoning mix
Earlwood has more land zoned for conservation (10% vs 0%).
| Canterbury | Earlwood | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 55% | 74% |
| Parks and recreation | 30% | 11% |
| Environmental | 0% | 10% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 7% | 2% |
| Commercial | 5% | 2% |
| Industrial | 3% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Canterbury | Earlwood | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,785 across Canterbury-Bankstown same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +50% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Canterbury | Earlwood | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.8% $1,080/wk on $2M | 2.8% $1,140/wk on $2.1M |
| Units | 5.2% $685/wk on $682K | 3.9% $640/wk on $848K |
Ranking within NSW
| Canterbury | Earlwood | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 84% of NSW | Higher than 86% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 66% of NSW | Higher than 78% of NSW |
| Schools | Higher than 1% of NSW | Higher than 69% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 94% of NSW | Higher than 97% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 18% of NSW | Higher than 21% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 92% of NSW | Higher than 86% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 93% of NSW | Higher than 86% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 14% of NSW | Higher than 15% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 75% of NSW | Higher than 21% of NSW |
Liveability
Earlwood scores higher overall (77 vs 61).
| Canterbury | Earlwood | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | A |
| Score | 61/100 | 77/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Earlwood carries more bushfire risk (21 vs 0); Canterbury carries more crime risk (53 vs 33).
| Canterbury | Earlwood | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 21/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 53/100 | Low 33/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km | 6 within 5 km |
Schools
| Canterbury | Earlwood | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 2 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Strathfield Campus, 4.9 km | 3 The University of Sydney, 6.4 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.9% | 2.8% |
Schools in Canterbury
- Canterbury Girls High School Government · Secondary at peers
- Canterbury South Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Canterbury Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Earlwood
- Earlwood Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Undercliffe Public School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Canterbury | Earlwood | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 12 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 16 |
| Childcare | 3 | 11 |
| GPs | 2 | 6 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 6 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 3 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 1 | 3 |
Mobility
| Canterbury | Earlwood | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 86/100 | 91/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 13.2 km +4% vs other | 12.7 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 24 min | 25 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 190.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 448.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.9% postcode 2193 | 1.3% postcode 2206 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 16 postcode 2193 | 25 postcode 2206 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (57.6%).
Setting
| Canterbury | Earlwood | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 4 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 48 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 6.1 km | 4.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Canterbury | Earlwood | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 87/100 | 77/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Hybrid fibre-coaxial |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 54% 4,272 premises | 12% 7,143 premises |
Climate
| Canterbury | Earlwood | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,129 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 27.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 9.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Canterbury | Earlwood | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 16.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.79 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Canterbury | Earlwood | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,322/yr same for both | |
| Council | Canterbury-Bankstown same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Canterbury | Earlwood | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Watson | Barton |
| Member | Tony Burke | Ash Ambihaipahar |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Canterbury | Earlwood | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Canterbury
Earlwood
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Canterbury
Other comparisons with Earlwood
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.