Cannon Creek vs Coochin
Cannon Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 51 against 54 in Coochin. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Cannon Creek, most households are couple families. On these figures, Cannon Creek tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Cannon Creek is already more of a family suburb (100% vs 60%)
- Coochin carries lower crime risk (34/100 vs 48/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Coochin
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (22% vs 28%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Cannon Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (28% vs 7%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Cannon Creek sits closer to the CBD (97.1 km vs 100.7 km)
- Coochin has a shorter drive in (86 min vs 91 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Coochin
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (34/100 vs 48/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Coochin
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (19.8% vs -3.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cannon Creek and Coochin drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Coochin has more residents (115 vs 75); Coochin has higher household incomes ($97,500 vs $84,448).
| Cannon Creek | Coochin | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75 | 115 +53% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -3.8% | +19.8% |
| Median age | 51 | 54 |
| Median household income | $84,448/yr | $97,500/yr +15% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $195/wk | $200/wk +3% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.3%).
Development activity
| Cannon Creek | Coochin | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 524 across Scenic Rim same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +65% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Cannon Creek | Coochin | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 55% of QLD | Higher than 72% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 22% of QLD | Higher than 65% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 51% of QLD | Higher than 52% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 32% of QLD | Higher than 41% of QLD |
Liveability
| Cannon Creek | Coochin | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Cannon Creek carries more bushfire risk (69 vs 0); Cannon Creek carries more crime risk (48 vs 34).
| Cannon Creek | Coochin | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 69/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 48/100 | Low 34/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Cannon Creek | Coochin | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Cannon Creek | Coochin | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 6 | 3 |
Mobility
Coochin sits further from the CBD (100.7 km vs 97.1 km).
| Cannon Creek | Coochin | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 97.1 km | 100.7 km +4% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 91 min | 86 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 4310 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 77 postcode 4310 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (70.0%).
Setting
| Cannon Creek | Coochin | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 194 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 207 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Cannon Creek | Coochin | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 25/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 37 premises | 0% 55 premises |
Climate
| Cannon Creek | Coochin | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,682 mm | 1,016 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Cannon Creek | Coochin | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,689/yr same for both | |
| Council | Scenic Rim same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Cannon Creek | Coochin | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wright same for both | |
| Member | Scott Buchholz same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cannon Creek | Coochin | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cannon Creek
Other comparisons with Coochin
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.