Cannington vs Queens Park
In Cannington, most households rent. In Queens Park, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. Houses cost more in Queens Park: a median of $820,000, against $750,000 in Cannington. On these figures, Cannington tends to suit renters and young adults, while Queens Park suits families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Queens Park
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools rated above their peers (2 vs 0)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (76% vs 46%)
- carries lower crime risk (71/100 vs 95/100)
- But Cannington has more parks and reserves (14 vs 10)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Cannington
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (59% vs 42%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Cannington
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (92/100 vs 79/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Cannington
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (54% vs 24%)
- is more walkable (92/100 vs 79/100)
- But Queens Park carries lower crime risk (71/100 vs 95/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Cannington is growing faster (16.0% vs 9.2%)
- Queens Park returns a higher gross yield on units (7.0% vs 5.6%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Cannington and Queens Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Queens Park has higher household incomes ($89,596 vs $81,016); Queens Park skews older (32 vs 30).
| Cannington | Queens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,875 | 7,268 +6% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +16.0% | +9.2% |
| Median age | 30 | 32 |
| Median household income | $81,016/yr | $89,596/yr +11% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk same for both | |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (30.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.0%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cannington | Queens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $750,000 | $820,000 |
| Median unit price | $570,000 | $600,000 |
| Median land price | — | $415,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 26 days from 57 sales | 13 days from 69 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
54 vs 16 sales
29 vs 8 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
14 vs 7 sales
59 vs 80 sales
20 vs 54 sales
Development activity
| Cannington | Queens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 423 across Canning same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -3% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Cannington | Queens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 5.3% $770/wk on $749K | 4.9% $800/wk on $849K |
| Units | 5.6% $700/wk on $649K | 7.0% $750/wk on $558K |
Ranking within WA
| Cannington | Queens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 43% of WA | Higher than 54% of WA |
| Schools | Higher than 22% of WA | Higher than 89% of WA |
| Walkability | Higher than 99% of WA | Higher than 94% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 77% of WA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 76% of WA | Higher than 79% of WA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 89% of WA | Higher than 78% of WA |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 61% of WA | Higher than 93% of WA |
Liveability
Queens Park scores higher overall (75 vs 39); Cannington is more walkable (92 vs 79).
| Cannington | Queens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | A |
| Score | 39/100 | 75/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Cannington carries more flood risk (59 vs 0); Cannington carries more bushfire risk (45 vs 0).
| Cannington | Queens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 45/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | High 95/100 | High 71/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 59/100 | None 0/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Moderate 50/100 | High 70/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 23 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Cannington | Queens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Curtin University of Technology, 3.0 km | 3 Curtin University of Technology, 3.7 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 4.0% | 3.4% |
Schools in Cannington
- Cannington Community College Government · Combined at peers
- Sevenoaks Senior College Government · Secondary
- Cannington Community Education Support Centre Government · Secondary · Special school
Schools in Queens Park
- St Joseph's School Catholic · Primary above peers
- St Norbert College Catholic · Secondary above peers
- Queens Park Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Cannington | Queens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 6 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 38 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 10 |
| Childcare | 5 | 4 |
| GPs | 3 same for both | |
| Pharmacies | 6 | 1 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 8 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 3 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 2 | 0 |
Mobility
| Cannington | Queens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 92/100 | 79/100 |
| Distance to Perth | 11.2 km | 12.1 km +8% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 18 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Bus | 95/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 630.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 224.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.0% postcode 6107 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 52 postcode 6107 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (74.3%).
Setting
| Cannington | Queens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 13 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 14 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 17.4 km | 18.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Cannington | Queens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 62/100 | 66/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 27% 4,246 premises | 38% 3,108 premises |
Climate
| Cannington | Queens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 663 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 32.3°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Cannington | Queens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,833/yr same for both | |
| Council | Canning same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Cannington | Queens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Swan same for both | |
| Member | Zaneta Mascarenhas same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cannington | Queens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Cannington
Queens Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cannington
Other comparisons with Queens Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.