Camp Hill vs Norman Park
In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Camp Hill, most households are couple families. In Norman Park, about half of households are couple families. Norman Park is closer to the city centre: 6.6 km, against 7.9 km. On these figures, Camp Hill tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Camp Hill
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (11 vs 3)
- has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 1)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (84% vs 69%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Camp Hill has more GPs (3 vs 1)
- Norman Park has more units and townhouses to downsize into (31% vs 16%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Norman Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.3% vs 2.4%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Camp Hill and Norman Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Camp Hill has more residents (12,254 vs 6,842).
| Camp Hill | Norman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,254 +44% vs other | 6,842 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +9.4% | +8.8% |
| Median age | 35 same for both | |
| Median household income | $160,420/yr +7% vs other | $149,708/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $460/wk +2% vs other | $450/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Camp Hill | Norman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,917,500 | $1,817,500 |
| Median unit price | $841,000 | $822,500 |
| Median land price | $1,400,000 | $1,505,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 25 days from 159 sales | 22 days from 79 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
19 vs 35 sales
6 vs 11 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
12 vs 12 sales
90 vs 34 sales
56 vs 34 sales
91 vs 39 sales
Development activity
| Camp Hill | Norman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 9,382 across Brisbane same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +9% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Camp Hill | Norman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.4% $885/wk on $1.89M | 4.3% $1,025/wk on $1.25M |
| Units | 3.7% $582/wk on $824K | 3.9% $650/wk on $862K |
Ranking within QLD
| Camp Hill | Norman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 98% of QLD | Higher than 97% of QLD |
| Schools | Higher than 32% of QLD | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 95% of QLD | Higher than 97% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 97% of QLD | Higher than 98% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 88% of QLD | Higher than 86% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 4% of QLD | Higher than 66% of QLD |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 18% of QLD | Higher than 27% of QLD |
Liveability
Norman Park scores higher overall (87 vs 71).
| Camp Hill | Norman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | A+ |
| Score | 71/100 | 87/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
| Camp Hill | Norman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 47/100 | Moderate 55/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 5 within 5 km | 9 within 5 km |
Schools
| Camp Hill | Norman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 2 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Brisbane C.Q.U. Campus, 5.9 km | 3 90 Bowen Terrace, Fortitude Valley QLD 4006, 3.6 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 3.7% | 4.0% |
Schools in Camp Hill
- Camp Hill State Infants and Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- St Thomas' School Catholic · Primary below peers
- Whites Hill State College Government · Combined below peers
Schools in Norman Park
- Norman Park State School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Camp Hill | Norman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 same for both | |
| Cafes & restaurants | 15 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 same for both | |
| Childcare | 11 | 3 |
| GPs | 3 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 1 same for both | |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 2 |
Mobility
| Camp Hill | Norman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 79/100 | 84/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 7.9 km +16% vs other | 6.6 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 16 min | 13 min |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Bus | 79/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 209.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 116.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.6% postcode 4152 | 2.7% postcode 4170 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 52 postcode 4152 | 39 postcode 4170 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (56.6%).
Setting
| Camp Hill | Norman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 40 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 19 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 8.3 km | 8.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Camp Hill | Norman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 76/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 2% 5,010 premises | 2% 3,036 premises |
Climate
| Camp Hill | Norman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,032 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Camp Hill | Norman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 15.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.68 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Camp Hill | Norman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,519/yr same for both | |
| Council | Brisbane same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Camp Hill | Norman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Griffith same for both | |
| Member | Renee Coffey same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Camp Hill | Norman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Camp Hill
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Camp Hill
Other comparisons with Norman Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.