Caloola vs Triangle Flat
Triangle Flat is the younger of the two, with a median age of 37 against 42 in Caloola. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Triangle Flat tends to suit families with children and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Caloola carries lower crime risk (0/100 vs 67/100)
- Triangle Flat is already more of a family suburb (100% vs 64%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Caloola
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (10% vs 26%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Caloola
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (203 min vs 223 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (239.1 km vs 258.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Caloola carries lower crime risk (0/100 vs 67/100)
- Triangle Flat has more residents already 65 and over (21% vs 8%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Triangle Flat
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (10.7% vs -29.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Caloola and Triangle Flat drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Caloola skews older (42 vs 37).
| Caloola | Triangle Flat | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 62 same for both | |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -29.5% | +10.7% |
| Median age | 42 | 37 |
| Median household income | $75,816/yr +6% vs other | $71,500/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $175/wk same for both | |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.8%).
Zoning mix
| Caloola | Triangle Flat | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 100% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Caloola | Triangle Flat | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 177 across Bathurst same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -23% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Caloola | Triangle Flat | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 43% of NSW | Higher than 38% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 11% of NSW | Higher than 35% of NSW |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 43% of NSW | Higher than 44% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 34% of NSW | Higher than 18% of NSW |
Liveability
| Caloola | Triangle Flat | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Triangle Flat carries more crime risk (67 vs 0); Triangle Flat carries more bushfire risk (40 vs 27).
| Caloola | Triangle Flat | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 27/100 | Moderate 40/100 |
| Crime | None 0/100 | Moderate 67/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Caloola | Triangle Flat | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Caloola | Triangle Flat | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 16 | 21 |
Mobility
Triangle Flat sits further from the CBD (258.2 km vs 239.1 km).
| Caloola | Triangle Flat | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Sydney | 239.1 km | 258.2 km +8% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 203 min | 223 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 2795 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 47 postcode 2795 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (63.9%).
Setting
| Caloola | Triangle Flat | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 913 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 1,001 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Caloola | Triangle Flat | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 24/100 | 15/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 29 premises | 0% 20 premises |
Climate
| Caloola | Triangle Flat | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 666 mm | 738 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.4°C | — |
| Winter min (Jul) | 1.1°C | — |
Council rates
| Caloola | Triangle Flat | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,301/yr same for both | |
| Council | Bathurst same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Caloola | Triangle Flat | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Calare same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Gee same for both | |
| Party | Independent same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Caloola | Triangle Flat | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Triangle Flat
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Caloola
Other comparisons with Triangle Flat
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.