Byng vs Emu Swamp
Emu Swamp is the younger of the two, with a median age of 51 against 54 in Byng. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Byng, about half of households are people living alone. In Emu Swamp, most households are couple families. On these figures, Byng tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Byng carries lower crime risk (0/100 vs 14/100)
- Emu Swamp is already more of a family suburb (72% vs 50%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Emu Swamp
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (9% vs 15%)
- has cheaper rent ($250/wk vs $303/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Byng
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (252.1 km vs 255.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Byng
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (0/100 vs 14/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (27% vs 21%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Byng
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (4.0% vs -3.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Byng and Emu Swamp drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Emu Swamp has more residents (156 vs 52); Emu Swamp has higher household incomes ($139,724 vs $102,336).
| Byng | Emu Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 52 | 156 +200% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.0% | -3.7% |
| Median age | 54 | 51 |
| Median household income | $102,336/yr | $139,724/yr +37% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $303/wk +17% vs other | $250/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (28.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.2%).
Property market
| Byng | Emu Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $1,060,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $7,400 |
Zoning mix
Byng has more rural and farming land (100% vs 81%); Emu Swamp has more land zoned for conservation (19% vs 0%).
| Byng | Emu Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 100% | 81% |
| Environmental | 0% | 19% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Byng | Emu Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 29 across Cabonne same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -43% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Byng | Emu Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 55% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 70% of NSW | Higher than 92% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 53% of NSW | Higher than 47% of NSW |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 60% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 42% of NSW | Higher than 45% of NSW |
Liveability
| Byng | Emu Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Emu Swamp carries more bushfire risk (21 vs 0); Emu Swamp carries more crime risk (14 vs 0).
| Byng | Emu Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 21/100 |
| Crime | None 0/100 | Low 14/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Byng | Emu Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Byng | Emu Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 7 | 9 |
Mobility
Emu Swamp sits further from the CBD (255.1 km vs 252.1 km).
| Byng | Emu Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 8/100 | 5/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 252.1 km | 255.1 km +1% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 228 min | 224 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2800 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 48 postcode 2800 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (71.2%).
Setting
| Byng | Emu Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 839 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 831 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Byng | Emu Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 28/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 29 premises | 0% 74 premises |
Climate
| Byng | Emu Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 894 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.3°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 2.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Byng | Emu Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 10.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.4 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Byng | Emu Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $750/yr same for both | |
| Council | Cabonne same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Byng | Emu Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Calare same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Gee same for both | |
| Party | Independent same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Byng | Emu Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Byng
Emu Swamp
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Byng
Other comparisons with Emu Swamp
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.