Bushland Beach vs Mount Low
Mount Low is the younger of the two, with a median age of 29 against 35 in Bushland Beach. In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Mount Low tends to suit young adults and families with children.
Bushland Beach and Mount Low are comparable outer suburbs, though they appeal to different priorities. Bushland Beach has a notably higher liveability score (53 versus 44) and walkability score (38 versus 21), making it more pedestrian-friendly, while also recording lower crime risk at 55 compared to Mount Low's 66. Mount Low skews younger with a median age of 29 years against Bushland Beach's 35, and offers a slightly lower median house price of $696,000 versus $739,307. Median household incomes are nearly identical, and both suburbs face no bushfire or flood risk.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Bushland Beach
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (55/100 vs 66/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Bushland Beach
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper land ($299,900 vs $650,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Bushland Beach is more walkable (38/100 vs 21/100)
- Mount Low sits closer to the CBD (1370.4 km vs 1374.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Bushland Beach
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (2 vs 0)
- is more walkable (38/100 vs 21/100)
- carries lower crime risk (55/100 vs 66/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mount Low
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (17.9% vs 7.4%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Bushland Beach and Mount Low drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Bushland Beach skews older (35 vs 29).
| Bushland Beach | Mount Low | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,641 +17% vs other | 5,488 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +7.4% | +17.9% |
| Median age | 35 | 29 |
| Median household income | $118,716/yr +1% vs other | $117,468/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $380/wk +3% vs other | $370/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bushland Beach | Mount Low | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $745,000 | $705,500 |
| Median unit price | — | $520,000 |
| Median land price | $299,900 | $650,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 27 days from 88 sales | 15 days from 66 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
38 vs 39 sales
232 vs 142 sales
20 vs 6 sales
Development activity
| Bushland Beach | Mount Low | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,096 across Townsville same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -22% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Bushland Beach | Mount Low | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.5% $690/wk on $799K | 4.1% $615/wk on $787K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Bushland Beach | Mount Low | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 89% of QLD same for both | |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 84% of QLD | Higher than 79% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 70% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 96% of QLD | Higher than 97% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 76% of QLD | Higher than 59% of QLD |
Liveability
Bushland Beach is more walkable (38 vs 21); Bushland Beach scores higher overall (57 vs 48).
| Bushland Beach | Mount Low | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 57/100 | 48/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Mount Low carries more crime risk (66 vs 55).
| Bushland Beach | Mount Low | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 55/100 | Moderate 66/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | High 75/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Bushland Beach | Mount Low | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Bushland Beach | Mount Low | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 2 |
| Childcare | 2 | 1 |
| GPs | 2 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 2 | 1 |
Mobility
Bushland Beach sits further from the CBD (1374.1 km vs 1370.4 km).
| Bushland Beach | Mount Low | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 38/100 | 21/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 1374.1 km | 1370.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 938 min | 934 min |
| Public transport score | 37/100 Bus | 38/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 8.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 8.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 4818 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 87 postcode 4818 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (87.8%).
Setting
| Bushland Beach | Mount Low | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 12 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 11 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 891 m | 3.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Bushland Beach | Mount Low | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 93/100 | 95/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 87% 2,671 premises | 91% 1,802 premises |
Climate
| Bushland Beach | Mount Low | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,304 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.8°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 15.0°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Bushland Beach | Mount Low | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 15.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.25 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Bushland Beach | Mount Low | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,810/yr same for both | |
| Council | Townsville same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bushland Beach | Mount Low | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Herbert same for both | |
| Member | Phillip Thompson same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bushland Beach | Mount Low | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Bushland Beach
Mount Low
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bushland Beach
Other comparisons with Mount Low
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.