Burrapine vs South Arm
South Arm is the younger of the two, with a median age of 49 against 52 in Burrapine. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. On these figures, South Arm tends to suit older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 5 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
South Arm
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (24% vs 50%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
South Arm
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (20% vs 44%)
- has cheaper rent ($178/wk vs $250/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
South Arm
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (348 min vs 363 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (498.6 km vs 515 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
South Arm
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (28% vs 19%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Burrapine and South Arm drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
South Arm has more residents (311 vs 58); South Arm has higher household incomes ($46,800 vs $29,900).
| Burrapine | South Arm | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58 | 311 +436% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -1.7% | -0.6% |
| Median age | 52 | 49 |
| Median household income | $29,900/yr | $46,800/yr +57% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $250/wk +29% vs other | $178/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.5%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Burrapine | South Arm | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $1,659,700 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $335,000 |
Zoning mix
| Burrapine | South Arm | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 100% | 91% |
| Environmental | 0% | 9% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Burrapine | South Arm | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 109 across Nambucca Valley same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -64% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Burrapine | South Arm | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 79% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 1% of NSW | Higher than 9% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 49% of NSW | Higher than 42% of NSW |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 4% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 33% of NSW | — |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 21% of NSW | Higher than 63% of NSW |
Liveability
| Burrapine | South Arm | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Burrapine carries more bushfire risk (92 vs 77).
| Burrapine | South Arm | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 92/100 | High 77/100 |
| Crime | None 0/100 | — |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Burrapine | South Arm | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Burrapine | South Arm | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 9 same for both | |
Mobility
Burrapine sits further from the CBD (515 km vs 498.6 km).
| Burrapine | South Arm | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 5/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 515 km +3% vs other | 498.6 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 363 min | 348 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 2447 | 0.0% postcode 2449 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 62 postcode 2447 | 66 postcode 2449 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (66.7%).
Setting
| Burrapine | South Arm | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 151 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 133 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 33.5 km | 24.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Burrapine | South Arm | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 | 34/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 31 premises | 13% 151 premises |
Council rates
| Burrapine | South Arm | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,175/yr same for both | |
| Council | Nambucca Valley same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Burrapine | South Arm | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Cowper same for both | |
| Member | Pat Conaghan same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Burrapine | South Arm | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Burrapine
Other comparisons with South Arm
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.