Burnt Bridge vs Dondingalong
Burnt Bridge is the younger of the two, with a median age of 30 against 51 in Dondingalong. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Dondingalong, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Burnt Bridge tends to suit young adults, while Dondingalong suits people living alone and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Burnt Bridge is already more of a family suburb (79% vs 60%)
- Dondingalong carries lower crime risk (57/100 vs 97/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Burnt Bridge
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (35% vs 11%)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (15% vs 28%)
- has cheaper rent ($178/wk vs $330/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Burnt Bridge
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (281 min vs 296 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (421.2 km vs 432.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Dondingalong
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (22% vs 9%)
- carries lower crime risk (57/100 vs 97/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Dondingalong
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (7.2% vs -27.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Burnt Bridge and Dondingalong drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Dondingalong has more residents (712 vs 110); Dondingalong rents higher ($330/wk vs $178/wk).
| Burnt Bridge | Dondingalong | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 110 | 712 +547% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -27.6% | +7.2% |
| Median age | 30 | 51 |
| Median household income | $63,336/yr +4% vs other | $60,528/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $178/wk | $330/wk +85% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.0%).
Property market
| Burnt Bridge | Dondingalong | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $620,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $665,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 40 days from 4 sales |
Zoning mix
Dondingalong has more land zoned for conservation (13% vs 0%); Burnt Bridge has more rural and farming land (95% vs 84%).
| Burnt Bridge | Dondingalong | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 95% | 84% |
| Environmental | 0% | 13% |
| Residential | 5% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Burnt Bridge | Dondingalong | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 144 across Kempsey same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +380% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Burnt Bridge | Dondingalong | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 24% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 26% of NSW | Higher than 22% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 45% of NSW | Higher than 32% of NSW |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 56% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 7% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 53% of NSW | Higher than 48% of NSW |
Liveability
| Burnt Bridge | Dondingalong | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 19/100 |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Burnt Bridge carries more crime risk (97 vs 57); Burnt Bridge carries more bushfire risk (80 vs 54).
| Burnt Bridge | Dondingalong | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 80/100 | Moderate 54/100 |
| Crime | High 97/100 | Moderate 57/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Burnt Bridge | Dondingalong | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Burnt Bridge | Dondingalong | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 2 | 7 |
Mobility
Dondingalong sits further from the CBD (432.2 km vs 421.2 km).
| Burnt Bridge | Dondingalong | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 4/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 421.2 km | 432.2 km +3% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 281 min | 296 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 2440 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 53 postcode 2440 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (76.0%).
Setting
| Burnt Bridge | Dondingalong | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 42 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 105 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 17.9 km | 22.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Burnt Bridge | Dondingalong | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 37 premises | 0% 304 premises |
Council rates
| Burnt Bridge | Dondingalong | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,447/yr same for both | |
| Council | Kempsey same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Burnt Bridge | Dondingalong | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Cowper same for both | |
| Member | Pat Conaghan same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Burnt Bridge | Dondingalong | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Burnt Bridge
Dondingalong
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Burnt Bridge
Other comparisons with Dondingalong
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.